Impact of Anomalous Aortic Origin of Coronary Artery on Coronary Angiography: A Comparative Study
Arnaud Brochier1, Sofien Zayed1, Pierre Aubry2,3
1North Site Cardiology Department, University Hospital of La Réunion, Saint-Denis, France.
Insights
Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) significantly reduces coronary angiography success rates and increases procedural risks. This highlights the need for specialized training and optimized protocols for AAOCA patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) poses challenges in coronary angiography (CA), affecting procedural success.
- While AAOCA prevalence and risks are known, its specific impact on CA outcomes remains unquantified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of AAOCA on CA success and safety.
- Focus on catheterization success rates, procedural quality, radiation exposure, and contrast media usage.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 96 AAOCA patients and 96 matched controls (2011-2022).
- Key endpoints: selective catheterization success, injection quality, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and contrast volume.
- Statistical analysis using conditional logistic regressions and generalized estimating equations.
Main Results:
- Significantly lower selective catheterization success in AAOCA+ group (28.1% vs. 90.6%).
- AAOCA+ group had lower injection quality, longer fluoroscopy times, higher radiation exposure, and greater contrast usage.
- All differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- AAOCA significantly decreases diagnostic catheterization success rates.
- AAOCA increases procedural risks including radiation exposure and contrast use.
- Specialized training and optimized protocols are crucial for improving CA outcomes in AAOCA patients.
Background:
Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) presents significant challenges during coronary angiography (CA), impacting procedural success rates. Although existing literature on AAOCA prevalence and risks, no study has quantified its specific impact on CA outcomes.
Aims:
This study aimed to evaluate AAOCA's effect on CA success and safety, focusing on catheterization success rates, procedural quality, radiation exposure, and iodine contrast usage.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 96 patients with confirmed AAOCA (AAOCA+) matched with 96 controls (AAOCA-), based on single-center data from 2011 to 2022. Key endpoints were selective catheterization success rate, injection quality, fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, and the amount of contrast. Statistical analyses were performed using conditional logistic regressions and generalized estimating equations.
Results:
Selective catheterization was significantly less successful in the AAOCA+ group compared to the AAOCA- group (28.1% vs. 90.6%; OR: 24.1, 95% CI: 10.3-62.6, p < 0.0001). The AAOCA+ group also demonstrated lower injection quality (61.5% vs. 100%, p < 0.0001), longer fluoroscopy times (11.4 ± 0.8 vs. 5.9 ± 0.8 min, p < 0.0001), higher radiation exposure (310.8 ± 35.8 vs. 189.9 ± 36.4 mGy, p = 0.02), and greater iodine contrast usage (99.5 ± 6.7 vs. 61.2 ± 7.6 mL, p = 0.0001).
Conclusions:
AAOCA significantly impacts the diagnostic catheterization success rate and increases the risk factors associated with CA. These findings highlight the need for specialized training and optimized protocols to improve outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Circulation
Coronary circulation begins at the base of the aorta, where two main arteries arise—the left and right coronary arteries. These arteries encircle the heart in the coronary sulcus and supply the...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT


