Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Epistasis Analysis01:09

Epistasis Analysis

4.9K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
4.9K
Epistasis01:39

Epistasis

46.5K
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
46.5K
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

38.1K
The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
38.1K
Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

4.9K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
4.9K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

6.5K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
6.5K
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

22.0K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
22.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of epistasis detection methods for quantitative phenotypes.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Extensive genetic interactions (epistasis) linked to alcohol use disorder in a high-risk population.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

EXTENSIVE GENETIC INTERACTIONS (EPISTASIS) LINKED TO ALCOHOL USE DISORDER IN A HIGH-RISK POPULATION.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Impact of Measurement Noise on Genetic Association Studies of Cardiac Function.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2023
Same author

Two Resveratrol Oligomers Inhibit Cathepsin L Activity to Suppress SARS-CoV-2 Entry.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2023
Same author

Ethyl-acetate fraction from a cinnamon-cortex extract protects pancreatic β-cells from oxidative stress damage.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.2K

Evaluation of epistasis detection methods for quantitative phenotypes.

Stanislav Listopad1, Gauri Renjith2, Qian Peng1

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|June 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

No single epistasis detection method is best for all genetic interaction types. Combining multiple tools improves detection of genetic interactions for complex human diseases.

Keywords:
epistasisgenetic interactionquantitative phenotypesimulationsoftware benchmark

More Related Videos

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

22.8K
In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.2K
An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

22.8K
In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Epistasis, or genetic interaction, is crucial for understanding common human diseases like Alzheimer's.
  • While tools for case-control data are compared, fewer studies evaluate methods for quantitative phenotypes.
  • Understanding epistasis in quantitative traits is vital for disease susceptibility research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of six epistasis detection methods for quantitative phenotypes.
  • To compare these tools across various genetic interaction types (dominant, multiplicative, recessive, XOR).
  • To assess tool performance on simulated and real-world genetic data.

Main Methods:

  • Six quantitative epistasis detection methods (EpiSNP, Matrix Epistasis, MIDESP, PLINK Epistasis, QMDR, REMMA) were identified.
  • Simulated datasets modeled different pairwise SNP interactions using EpiGEN.
  • Tools were tested on simulated data and the ABCD dataset for externalizing behavior.

Main Results:

  • Performance varied by interaction type; MDR had the highest overall detection rate (60%).
  • MDR and MIDESP excelled at multiplicative and XOR interactions.
  • PLINK Epistasis, Matrix Epistasis, and REMMA detected dominant interactions perfectly (100%). EpiSNP was best for recessive interactions (66%).
  • Analysis of the ABCD dataset identified relevant SNPs in *DRD2* and *DRD4* genes.

Conclusions:

  • No single epistasis detection tool consistently outperforms others for all interaction types.
  • Given unknown epistasis types in datasets, using multiple algorithms in combination is recommended for comprehensive results.
  • This approach enhances the detection of complex genetic interactions influencing disease susceptibility.