Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Dynamics in experiences, information and counselling needs of patients without or with minor LARS after rectal cancer
Fien Serroyen1, Ann Van Hecke2, Liesbet Delforge3
1Ghent University, Belgium.
Purpose:
After sphincter-sparing rectal cancer surgery many patients experience bowel dysfunction, known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Major LARS significantly impacts quality of life (QOL). Patients without LARS or with minor LARS report fewer bowel-related issues This study aims to investigate the dynamics in the experiences, information and counselling needs of patients with or without minor LARS to create a comprehensive overview of LARS.
Method:
A grounded theory study was conducted. Adult rectal cancer survivors with no LARS or minor LARS were recruited from three large hospitals. Patients with major LARS, with a permanent stoma and non-Dutch-speaking patients, were excluded. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews, data were analysed using the constant comparative method and researchers' triangulation.
Results:
Fourteen patients were interviewed, six without LARS and eight with minor LARS. All patients reported LARS-related symptoms during the first months post-surgery, which impacted their QOL. Over time, symptoms became manageable and other long-term effects were perceived as more severe. Experiences were shaped by their perspective and context. Information needs varied, extensive information caused anxiety for some, but was crucial for preparation.
Conclusion:
Patients with no or minor LARS experienced manageable symptoms that diminished in priority. Experiences were influenced by individual perceptions. Preoperative information should be adapted to minimize anxiety and align with patients' coping mechanisms. Healthcare providers should assess patients' risk of major LARS and engage them in shared decision-making, potentially using patient decision aids specifically designed for rectal surgery.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease