Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Cutting Procedures, Tensile Testing, and Ageing of Flexible Unidirectional Composite Laminates
Published on: April 27, 2019
Opposing flanks vs parallel flanks - The influence of screw design on compression and pull-out strength
Alexander Beer1, Rachel Tan2, Alba Morillo-Paterson2
1Foot & Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Background:
Screws generate and maintain compression against distracting forces when performing osteotomy or fusion surgery. Headless screws have been recently designed with opposing flank angles (OFA) between the proximal and shaft threads and are purported to achieve better compression. The aim of this study was to compare OFA designs against traditional parallel flank angle (PFA) headless screws, and headed screws, to determine differences in compression and pull-out strength (POS).
Methods:
This was a biomechanical, in-vitro sawbone study comparing four screw designs: two opposing flank headless designs (Screw AO, Screw BO), one parallel flank headless design (Screw CP) and one headed design (Screw DH). All screws were 4.0 mm diameter x 50 mm length, partially threaded, cannulated screws typically used in foot and ankle surgery (five screws tested for each design). Screw BO had a shorter and narrower proximal threaded portion than Screws AO and CP. A custom apparatus was designed for measuring compression and POS. An osteotomy was created in sawbone blocks of 0.32 g/cm 3 density which simulated cancellous bone. The divided segments were apposed with four strain-gauged load cells in between. Screws were inserted per manufacture recommendations, perpendicular to the osteotomy and maximum compression was measured. To measure POS, block segments were distracted in increasing increments until the construct failed.
Results:
There was a significant difference in compression between all screws: Screw AO, 311.0 ± 4.2 N; Screw CP, 201.4 ± 28.6 N; Screw BO, 168.6 ± 15.9 N; Screw DH, 119.8 ± 13.2 N (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in POS between Screw AO (466.0 ± 29.0 N) and Screw Cp (399.0 ± 46.0 N, p = 0.089), but the other screws had significantly lower POS: Screw BO, 310.0 ± 22.0 N; Screw DH, 183.0 ± 12.9 N (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
One of the OFA designs exhibited the highest compression and POS in this sawbone model. However, the variable results between designs suggests other screw design features may have a greater influence than the opposing of flank angles.
Related Concept Videos
Frictional Forces on Screws
A jack with a square-threaded screw is a mechanical device used to lift heavy loads by applying a force at its handle. When the force is applied, the screw turns, raising the load. The screw can...
Self-Locking Screw
A square-threaded screw jack carrying a load is considered self-locking if the screw retains its position even after the moment applied to it is removed.
Screw: Problem Solving
To evaluate the...
Upward Impending Motion
To better comprehend how a screw jack functions, consider the completely unraveled thread as a block in contact with the...
Design of Transmission Shafts - Stress Analysis
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete

