Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
Published on: August 18, 2020
Altered Neurobehavioral Reward Response Predicts Psychotic-Like Experiences in Youth Exposed to Cannabis Prenatally
Carolyn M Amir1, Dara G Ghahremani2, Sarah E Chang1
1Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Background:
Rates of prenatal cannabis exposure (PCE) are rising with increasingly permissive legislation, which may be a risk factor for psychosis. Disrupted reward-related neural circuitry may underlie this relationship. We aim to elucidate neural mechanisms involved in the association between PCE and youth-onset psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) by probing correlates of reward anticipation, a neurobehavioral marker of endocannabinoid-mediated dopaminergic function.
Methods:
This longitudinal, prospective study analyzed task-related functional neuroimaging data from baseline (N = 11,368), 2-year follow-up (n = 7928), and 4-year follow-up (n = 2982) of the ongoing ABCD (Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development) Study, which recruited children ages 9 to 10 years at baseline from 22 sites across the United States.
Results:
PCE (652 exposed youths) was longitudinally associated with PLEs. Blunted neural response to reward anticipation was associated with PLEs, with stronger effects observed in PCE youths (all |βs| > 0.5; false discovery rate [FDR]-corrected p < .05). This baseline hypoactivation predicted PLEs in middle adolescence (β = -0.004; pFDR < .05) and mediated the relationship between PCE and PLEs. Dampened behavioral reward sensitivity was associated with PLEs across visits (|β| = 0.21; pFDR < .001). PLEs were positively associated with trait-level measures of reward motivation and impulsivity, with stronger effects for PCE youths (all |βs| > 0.1; all pFDR < .05).
Conclusions:
Blunted striatal activation may serve as a biomarker for disrupted reward processing and increased psychosis risk during development. PCE may affect childhood behaviors and traits related to altered reward sensitivity.
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Biological Causes of Schizophrenia
Genetic Factors in Schizophrenia
The genetic basis of schizophrenia is strongly supported by family and twin...

