Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
How do programme directors perceive trainee attrition? A qualitative focus group study in three Dutch teaching
Kirsten Dijkhuizen1, Jacqueline Bustraan1, Maartje E D van den Bogaard2
1Center for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Objective:
To gain insight into programme directors' (PDs') perceptions of trainee attrition from postgraduate medical education (PGME), focusing on interactions between stakeholders within the learning environment and roles of PDs in the process leading to attrition.
Design, Setting And Participants:
We performed a focus group study with 27 PDs from three Dutch teaching hospitals and analysed transcripts using template analysis.
Results:
PDs identified attrition as a multilevel problem, in which personal, workplace and system-bound factors play a role. PDs mentioned balancing professional and personal responsibilities, in particular parenthood and high ambitions, as important trainee-related factors. PDs adopt different, at times conflicting, roles when guiding trainees, for example, assessor and mentor, and they struggle to balance these roles. They displayed various emotions when discussing attrition, varying from disappointment to frustration and anger, yet could also frame attrition positively as new opportunity. PDs used numerous resources to support trainees in difficulty, in a reactive rather than in a pro-active manner. A generation difference between faculty and trainees regarding work-life balance was mentioned as impeding mutual understanding. On the system level, PDs observed how implicit beliefs and negative interactions between actors in the learning environment impede trainees' well-being.
Conclusions:
PDs perceived trainee attrition as a multi-level problem that highlighted conflicting roles for the PD and evoked a wide range of emotions. The authors propose the following interventions: (1) address conflicting roles of PDs by reallocating specific tasks to other independent 'third parties', for example, professional coaching; (2) implement pro-active support for trainees unrelated to assessment; (3) create awareness of implicit assumptions of stakeholders and promote social belonging; (4) foster a supportive learning climate with clinical leaders as role models.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Longitudinal Research
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Surveys

