Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Impact of AI-Generated ADC Maps on Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Feasibility Study
Kutsev B Ozyoruk1, Stephanie A Harmon1, Enis C Yilmaz2
1Artificial Intelligence Resource, Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (K.B.O., S.A.H., D.G.G., B.D.S., R.L., P.L.C., B.T.); Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (K.B.O., S.A.H., D.G.G., B.D.S., R.L., P.L.C., B.T.).
Rationale And Objectives:
To evaluate the impact of AI-generated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps on diagnostic performance of a 3D U-Net AI model for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and segmentation at biparametric MRI (bpMRI).
Material And Methods:
The study population was retrospectively collected and consisted of 178 patients, including 119 cases and 59 controls. Cases had a mean age of 62.1 years (SD=7.4) and a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 7.27ng/mL (IQR=5.43-10.55), while controls had a mean age of 63.4 years (SD=7.5) and a median PSA of 6.66ng/mL (IQR=4.29-11.30). All participants underwent 3.0 T T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MRI and high b-value echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (bpMRI), followed by either prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy between January 2013 and December 2022. We compared the lesion detection and segmentation performance of a pretrained 3D U-Net AI model using conventional ADC maps versus AI-generated ADC maps. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical comparison, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated via bootstrapping. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
AI-ADC maps increased the accuracy of the lesion detection AI model, from 0.70 to 0.78 (p<0.01). Specificity increased from 0.22 to 0.47 (p<0.001), while maintaining high sensitivity, which was 0.94 with conventional ADC maps and 0.93 with AI-ADC maps (p>0.05). Mean dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for conventional ADC maps was 0.276, while AI-ADC maps showed a mean DSC of 0.225 (p<0.05). In the subset of patients with ISUP≥2, standard ADC maps demonstrated a mean DSC of 0.282 compared to 0.230 for AI-ADC maps (p<0.05).
Conclusion:
AI-generated ADC maps can improve performance of computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer.
More Related Videos
08:05Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
Published on: June 10, 2025
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025