Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Generation of Human CD40-activated B cells
Published on: October 16, 2009
Synergy and antagonism in the integration of BCR and CD40 signals that control B-cell population expansion
Helen Huang1,2,3, Haripriya Vaidehi Narayanan1,2, Mark Yankai Xiang1,2,3
1Signaling Systems Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Immunologyand Molecular Genetics (MIMG), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
In response to infection or vaccination, lymph nodes must select antigen-reactive B-cells while eliminating auto-reactive B-cells. B-cells are instructed via B-cell receptor (BCR), which binds antigen, and CD40 receptor by antigen-recognizing T-cells. How BCR and CD40 signaling are integrated quantitatively to jointly determine B-cell fate decisions remains unclear. Here, we developed a differential-equations-based model of BCR and CD40 signaling networks activating NFκB. The model recapitulates NFκB dynamics upon BCR and CD40 stimulation, and when linked to established cell decision models of cell cycle and survival control, the resulting cell population dynamics. However, upon costimulation, NFκB dynamics were correctly predicted but the predicted potentiated population expansion was not observed experimentally. We found that this discrepancy was due to BCR-induced caspase activity that may trigger apoptosis in founder cells, unless timely NFκB-induced survival gene expression protects them. Iterative model predictions and sequential co-stimulation experiments revealed how complex non-monotonic integration of BCR and CD40 signals controls positive and negative selection of B-cells. Our work suggests a temporal proof-reading mechanism for regulating the stringency of B-cell selection during antibody responses.
In response to infection or vaccination, lymph nodes must select antigen-reactive B-cells while eliminating auto-reactive B-cells. B-cells are instructed via B-cell receptor (BCR), which binds antigen, and CD40 receptor by antigen-recognizing T-cells. How BCR and CD40 signaling are integrated quantitatively to jointly determine B-cell fate decisions remains unclear. Here, we developed a differential-equations-based model of BCR and CD40 signaling networks activating NFκB. The model recapitulates NFκB dynamics upon BCR and CD40 stimulation, and when linked to established cell decision models of cell cycle and survival control, the resulting cell population dynamics. However, upon costimulation, NFκB dynamics were correctly predicted but the predicted potentiated population expansion was not observed experimentally. We found that this discrepancy was due to BCR-induced caspase activity that may trigger apoptosis in founder cells, unless timely NFκB-induced survival gene expression protects them. Iterative model predictions and sequential co-stimulation experiments revealed how complex non-monotonic integration of BCR and CD40 signals controls positive and negative selection of B-cells. Our work suggests a temporal proof-reading mechanism for regulating the stringency of B-cell selection during antibody responses.
Related Concept Videos
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...
Diversity of Antigen Receptors
Before encountering any antigen, lymphocytes express these receptors. On B cells, the antigen receptor is a membrane-bound antibody molecule called BCR; on T cells, it is a T cell receptor or TCR. B and T cell receptors are composed of two...
B Cell Activation and Differentiation
When naive B cells encounter a specific antigen that can bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) on their surface, they undergo sensitization to respond to the antigen's presence. Sensitization begins with...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...

