Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2026

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
Published on: August 20, 2019
Reflection on clinical and methodological issues in rare disease clinical trials
Johan Verbeeck1, Martin Geroldinger2,3, Joakim Nyberg4
1I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 4, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium. johan.verbeeck@uhasselt.be.
Abstract:
Rare diseases present critical challenges to healthcare systems, patients, and caregivers due to their low prevalence and unique characteristics. Designing clinical trials and developing statistical methodologies for evaluating interventions in rare diseases face several challenges. The "EBStatMax" project, part of the European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases' Demonstration Projects, aimed to address one of these challenges, namely: designing and analyzing longitudinal cross-over data in rare diseases, like Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS). Although the main findings of the project have been published elsewhere, this manuscript reflects on additional hurdles encountered during the project, particularly regarding outcomes and methodological considerations. It explores issues surrounding outcome measurement, statistical methodology, and clinical considerations, emphasizing their broader relevance to methodological advancements in rare disease research beyond this specific case. This manuscript highlights the critical role of international collaboration in rare disease research to enhance evidence quality and aims to inspire further advancements in the field.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Case Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients