Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Iris Fixation via External Pentagram Suturing
Published on: May 5, 2022
Complications and Management of Cosmetic Iris Implants
Shafi Balal1, Omer Jamall1, Imran Karim Janmohamed2
1Ophthalmology Department, From the Moorfields Eye Hospital (S.B., O.J., I.H., R.H., S.K., G.A., V.M.), London, United Kingdom.
Objective:
To evaluate the complications, management, and outcomes associated with cosmetic iris implants.
Design:
Single-center retrospective interventional case series.
Subjects:
30 eyes of 15 patients who presented to Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK with complications related to cosmetic iris implants between January 2008 and December 2023. Mean age at implantation was 34.13 ± 9.51 years, with predominantly Asian ethnicity (53%) and male gender (60%).
Methods:
Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, pre-explantation parameters, complications, management, and outcomes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell count (ECC), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were analyzed before and after explantation. Secondary interventions were documented, and statistical analyses were performed using paired t-tests and Pearson correlation coefficients.
Main Outcome Measures:
BCVA, IOP, ECC, CCT, presence of uveitis, glaucoma, corneal decompensation, cataract formation, and need for secondary surgical interventions.
Results:
Median time to explantation was 45.5 months (range: 6.0-140.1 months). The most common complications included uveitis (60%), elevated IOP requiring glaucoma surgery (33.3%), corneal decompensation requiring Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (20%), and cataract formation requiring phacoemulsification (13.3%). A statistically significant positive correlation was found between time to explantation and corneal decompensation (r = 0.392, P = .048). In patients who underwent DMEK (n=6), ECC increased significantly from 778.33 ± 191.53 cells/mm² to 1107.33 ± 17.96 cells/mm² postoperatively (P = .009), and mean CCT decreased from 783.17 ± 293.93 µm to 508.83 ± 48.94 µm (P = .1). Despite these interventions, a considerable proportion of patients experienced persisting symptoms requiring secondary surgery.
Conclusions:
This case series demonstrates that cosmetic iris implants are associated with serious sight-threatening complications including corneal decompensation, glaucoma, and uveitis. Many patients required multiple surgical interventions after explantation, highlighting the long-term morbidity associated with these devices. The authors recommend that cosmetic iris implantation should be banned worldwide given the substantial risks and lack of therapeutic value, and greater regulatory oversight is needed to prevent further harm to patients.
More Related Videos
05:19Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
Published on: December 1, 2023
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Glaucoma: Overview
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management