Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Preclinical Model to Assess Brain Recovery After Acute Stroke in Rats
Published on: November 6, 2019
External validation of risk prediction models for post-stroke mortality in Berlin
Lukas Reitzle1,2, Jessica L Rohmann2,3, Tobias Kurth3
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany reitzlel@rki.de.
Objectives:
Prediction models for post-stroke mortality can support medical decision-making. Although numerous models have been developed, external validation studies determining the models' transportability beyond the original settings are lacking. We aimed to assess the performance of two prediction models for post-stroke mortality in Berlin, Germany.
Design:
We used data from the Berlin-SPecific Acute Treatment in Ischaemic or hAemorrhagic stroke with Long-term follow-up (B-SPATIAL) registry.
Setting:
Multicentre stroke registry in Berlin, Germany.
Participants:
Adult patients admitted within 6 hours after symptom onset and with a 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases discharge diagnosis of ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke or transient ischaemic attack at one of 15 hospitals with stroke units between 1 January 2016 and 31 January 2021.
Primary Outcome Measures:
We evaluated calibration (calibration-in-the-large, intercept, slope and plot) and discrimination performance (c-statistic) of Bray et al's 30-day mortality and Smith et al's in-hospital mortality prediction models. Information on mortality was supplemented by Berlin city registration office records.
Results:
For the validation of Bray et al's model, we included 7879 patients (mean age 75; 55.0% men). We observed 763 (9.7%) deaths within 30 days of stroke compared with 680 (8.6%) predicted. The model's c-statistic was 0.865 (95% CI: 0.851 to 0.879). For Smith et al's model, we performed the validation among 1931 patients (mean age 75; 56.2% men), observing 105 (5.4%) in-hospital deaths compared with the 92 (4.8%) predicted. The c-statistic was 0.891 (95% CI: 0.864 to 0.918). The calibration plots of both models revealed an underestimation of the mortality risk for high-risk patients.
Conclusions:
Among Berlin stroke patients, both models showed good calibration performance for low and medium-risk patients and high discrimination while underestimating risk among high-risk patients. The acceptable performance of Bray et al's model in Berlin illustrates how a small number of routinely collected variables can be sufficient for valid prediction of post-stroke mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Typical Model Studies
Hazard Rate
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...

