Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
Two programs, too many names? A critical review of ride-sharing and safe-ride programs as alternatives to impaired
Asma Mamri1, Thomas G Brown1, José Ignacio Nazif-Muñoz1
1Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada.
Introduction:
Alternative transportation programs are widely promoted as a viable strategy for prevention of alcohol-impaired driving (AID) and crashes, with ride-sharing and safe-ride being two major approaches. The scientific literature on these programs frequently uses the terms "ride-sharing" and "safe-ride" interchangeably, though their meaning is not synonymous. This critical review set out to clarify the main characteristics of these programs to advance research, dissemination of the findings, and knowledge transfer in the alternative transportation field for AID and crash prevention.
Method:
A systematic literature search of six databases using the PRISMA-S checklist identified studies of ride-sharing and safe-ride programs to prevent AID or crashes. Inclusion criteria comprised studies published in academic and gray literature between 1980 and 2023. A six-step thematic analysis of included studies identified the defining characteristics of each program.
Results:
The 32 included studies evaluated for-profit ride-sharing/ride-hailing programs (n = 21) and safe-ride programs (n = 11). No studies on non-profit ride-sharing programs were identified. Analyses revealed two main themes. Operational strategies were most important for distinguishing between for-profit ride-sharing and safe-ride programs, with differences in these subthemes: purpose (revenue generation vs. AID reduction), management (private vs. private plus other strategies), funding (self-financing vs. external), and promotion (convenient transportation vs. dangers of AID). Service offerings, the second theme, highlighted differences in program costs, availability, accessibility, service capacity, coverage, and types of vehicles used.
Discussion:
The scientific literature on ride-sharing was limited to for-profit ride-sharing, suggesting that referring to them as "ride-hailing" in future studies would be more accurate. Both operational strategies and service offerings highlight the advantages and disadvantages of ride-hailing and safe-ride programs in the context of AID. Some programs referred to as ride-sharing programs have the same operational strategies as safe-ride programs, suggesting these be classified as safe-ride programs for conceptual coherence.
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Social Traps
Depressants
Alcohol is a common depressant that can induce a sense of relaxation and reduced inhibition at low doses. Contrary to its occasional...
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...

