Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Long-term secondary prevention with colchicine in patients with CAD: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Patrizia Boracchi1, Giuseppe Marano1, Ester Luconi2
1Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Studies of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Insights
Colchicine shows a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and composite cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. While benefits appear attenuated, colchicine remains valuable for reducing MI and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Colchicine, an anti-inflammatory agent, has been investigated for its role in cardiovascular disease management.
- Previous studies suggested potential benefits, but recent trials like CLEAR SYNERGY yielded neutral results for acute myocardial infarction (MI).
- A comprehensive meta-analysis is needed to re-evaluate colchicine's efficacy and safety in coronary artery disease (CAD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating colchicine's effect on cardiovascular events in patients with CAD.
- To update estimates of colchicine's benefit on individual endpoints and composite outcomes, including MI, urgent revascularization (UR), stroke, and mortality.
- To assess the safety profile of colchicine in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Searched for the largest RCTs of colchicine in CAD patients.
- Pooled analysis of individual events (MI, UR, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, total mortality) using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) via Cox models.
- Utilized fixed-effects or random-effects models for analysis.
- Assessed composite endpoints: MACE 1 (MI, UR, cardiovascular mortality) and MACE 2 (stroke, MI, total mortality).
- Evaluated safety outcomes, including non-cardiovascular mortality and serious adverse events.
Main Results:
- Five studies with 18,656 patients were included.
- Colchicine significantly reduced the risk of MI by 21% (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68 - 0.92).
- Composite endpoints MACE 1 and MACE 2 were reduced (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68 - 0.98 and HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79 - 0.98, respectively).
- No significant effect on total or cardiovascular mortality was observed.
- Safety assessment showed no differences in non-cardiovascular mortality, cancer, or serious gastrointestinal/infectious events.
Conclusions:
- Colchicine demonstrates a valuable role in reducing the risk of MI and composite cardiovascular events in CAD patients.
- Despite an apparent attenuation of benefit compared to earlier analyses, the drug remains significant for preventing MI and MACE.
- The safety profile appears reassuring, with no increased risk of serious adverse reactions observed in the meta-analysis.
Abstract:
The CLEAR SYNERGY trial failed to demonstrate any benefit of colchicine in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). In this meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of colchicine in coronary artery disease (CAD), we updated the estimates of effect on cardiovascular events in patients with CAD. We searched for the largest RCTs of colchicine in CAD patients. The effect was assessed in a pooled analysis of individual events such as MI, urgent coronary revascularization (UR), stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and total mortality, for each of these endpoints using hazard ratios (HR) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI), estimated by the Cox model. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were used. A similar approach was used for the composite of MI, UR, and cardiovascular mortality (MACE 1) and stroke, MI, total mortality (MACE 2). Safety was also assessed. Five studies were selected with a total of 18,656 patients. Colchicine reduced the risk of MI by 21 %, HR 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.68 - 0.92).Its effect was neutral on total and cardiovascular mortality. The composite endpoints MACE 1 and MACE 2 were reduced by colchicine, HR 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.68 - 0.98), and HR 0.88 (95 % CI: 0.79 - 0.98), respectively. There were no differences in non-cardiovascular mortality, cancer, and serious gastrointestinal and infectious events. The benefit of colchicine appears attenuated compared to past analyses, but is still valuable in reducing the risk of MI and the composite of MI, UR, and cardiovascular death. The safety appears reassuring in relation to all serious adverse reactions.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
04:02Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: Choledochoscopic Stone Extraction and Primary Duct Suture
Published on: November 25, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care