Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Competitive adsorption of arsenic, phosphate and humic substances onto goethite combined with the NOM-CD model
Yingxuan Deng1, Xinyu Zhang1, Chunyu Ren1
1School of Environment, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China.
Abstract:
In natural ecosystems, the (bio)availability of arsenic and phosphorus is greatly controlled by their interactions with metal (hydr)oxides and organic matter. Humic substances (HS), encompassing humic acids (HA) and fulvic acids (FA), constitute the primary form of organic matter. In this study, batch adsorption experiments were conducted and integrated with the NOM-CD model to achieve a molecular-level understanding of HS on the competitive interactions among arsenite, arsenate, and phosphate on goethite surfaces. Results demonstrate that the NOM-CD model is a reliable tool for elucidating the underlying interaction mechanisms of HS, arsenic and phosphate onto goethite. Both HA and FA exhibit a considerable impact on the competitive interactions between arsenite, arsenate, and phosphate at the goethite-water interface, particularly under acidic conditions. At pH below 5.0, influences of HA and FA on the interactions in arsenite-arsenate-phosphate-goethite systems demonstrate notable similarities. The larger particle size of HA results in a greater morphological variation of adsorbed HA (ξ = 5-8), generating not only a stronger steric hindrance effect but also a stronger electrostatic repulsion between the adsorbed HA and oxyanions on goethite. Conversely, the smaller particle size and greater density of carboxylic groups of FA facilitate closer interactions with the goethite surface, thereby reducing the electrostatic potential of goethite even without morphological change (ξ = 1). At pH 5-7, a higher amount of adsorbed HA results in intensified competition between carboxylic groups and oxyanions in comparison with FA, and consequently a higher concentration of arsenite, arsenate, and phosphate in solution. At pH above 7.0, the influence of HS diminishes due to an increase in both hydroxide ions in solution and negative charges on goethite surfaces, reducing the adsorption of arsenate, and phosphate and HS. The NOM-CD model identifies electrostatic repulsions and steric effects as the principal determinants in the complex interactions between multi-oxyanions and HS within goethite systems.
More Related Videos
08:21Optimized Procedure for Determining the Adsorption of Phosphonates onto Granular Ferric Hydroxide using a Miniaturized Phosphorus Determination Method
Published on: May 18, 2018
11:14Two-way Valorization of Blast Furnace Slag: Synthesis of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and Zeolitic Heavy Metal Adsorbent
Published on: February 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Gravimetry: Inorganic And Organic Precipitating Agents