Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol
Published on: October 27, 2023
Analysis of bone dimensional stability after two-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone versus
Isabella Neme Ribeiro Dos Reis1, Anouck Jue2, Eppo Wolvius3
1Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.
Objective:
To compare the dimensional stability of augmented bone following maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) using autogenous bone (AB) alone or bovine bone mineral combined with locally harvested AB chips (BBM), one year after implant loading.
Material And Methods:
A secondary analysis of a split-mouth, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted among 20 patients (40 implants). CBCT/CTs were used to measure bone height (buccal and palatal aspects) and bone area at the implant center at two time points: before implant placement (4-6 months post-MSFA, T1) and 12 months post-implant loading (T2). Residual bone height and sinus width at 1, 5, and 10 mm from the crest were also recorded. Linear regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the influence of graft material (AB and BBM), initial graft dimensions and sinus width on dimensional changes.
Results:
Adjusted regression models showed that AB-treated sites experienced significantly greater reductions in graft height (mean difference at buccal sites: -1.76 mm [95 % CI, -0.86 to -2.65]; p-value = <0.001); mean difference at palatal sites: -1.82 mm [95 % CI -0.75 to -2.88]; p = 0.001; and bone area (mean difference -17.80 mm² [95 % CI -6.61 to -28.99]; p = 0.002) compared to BBM. Greater initial graft height and area were associated with reduced dimensional changes (p < 0.001) especially when using BBM. Sinus width, measured 10 mm from the crest, was modestly but significantly associated with changes in bone height (p = 0.020), but not with changes in bone area (p = 0.147).
Conclusion:
MSFA using BBM combined with autogenous bone chips resulted in greater dimensional stability compared to AB alone.
Clinical Implications:
BBM combined with autogenous bone chips better preserved graft dimensions than AB alone.
More Related Videos
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
06:05Author Spotlight: Enhancing Bone Regeneration with Vascularized Artificial Cartilage Integration
Published on: July 14, 2023