Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Polymalic Acid-based Nano Biopolymers for Targeting of Multiple Tumor Markers: An Opportunity for Personalized Medicine?
Published on: June 13, 2014
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Neratinib With or Without Fulvestrant for Patients With HER2-Positive, Estrogen
Stefania Morganti1, Xiangying Chu2, Tarah J Ballinger3
1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
Background:
Most HER2-positive breast cancers co-express estrogen receptor (ER). Given crosstalk between HER2 and ER signaling pathways, dual blockade may be beneficial.
Methods:
In this randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial, patients with ER-positive (ER ≥ 10%), HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomized (1:1) to neratinib (240 mg daily) or the same dose of neratinib with fulvestrant. Any number of prior therapies was allowed; prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine were required. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate, and duration of response. Exploratory objectives included the identification of predictive biomarkers via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
Results:
Of 21 patients enrolled, 18 were evaluable for outcomes and safety (neratinib-fulvestrant arm, n = 8; neratinib-only arm, n = 10). The study was closed before completing enrollment due to slow accrual. Median PFS did not differ between treatment arms (2.79 months with neratinib-fulvestrant versus 5.55 months with neratinib only [HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.24-3.64; P = .98]). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 1 (12.5%) patient in the neratinib-fulvestrant arm and 6 (60%) patients in the neratinib-only arm, with diarrhea being the most frequent. Median OS did not differ between the 2 arms (P = .91). Clearance of ctDNA was associated with PFS and OS.
Conclusions:
The combination of neratinib and fulvestrant is safe and tolerable. Due to early study closure, this study was underpowered to detect the benefit of adding fulvestrant to neratinib. Chemotherapy-free regimens targeting ER and HER2 warrant further investigation, along with prospective studies investigating ctDNA dynamics may guide treatment switch.
Insights
Adding fulvestrant to neratinib did not improve progression-free survival in patients with ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer. The combination was safe, but the study was underpowered due to early closure.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Genetics
Background:
- Most HER2-positive breast cancers co-express estrogen receptor (ER).
- Crosstalk between HER2 and ER signaling pathways suggests dual blockade may be beneficial.
- Prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine were required for enrollment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neratinib plus fulvestrant versus neratinib alone in patients with ER-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
- To explore circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a predictive biomarker.
Main Methods:
- Randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial.
- Patients randomized (1:1) to neratinib (240 mg daily) or neratinib plus fulvestrant.
- Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS); Secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS), overall response rate, duration of response.
Main Results:
- Study closed early due to slow accrual; 18 patients evaluable.
- Median PFS did not differ significantly between arms (2.79 months vs. 5.55 months).
- Neratinib plus fulvestrant was safe and tolerable; diarrhea was most frequent Grade 3 AE in the neratinib-only arm.
- ctDNA clearance associated with PFS and OS.
Conclusions:
- Neratinib plus fulvestrant combination is safe and tolerable.
- Study underpowered to detect benefit of adding fulvestrant to neratinib due to early closure.
- Chemotherapy-free regimens targeting ER and HER2 warrant further investigation; ctDNA dynamics may guide treatment decisions.
More Related Videos
11:12Optimization of a Multiplex RNA-based Expression Assay Using Breast Cancer Archival Material
Published on: August 1, 2018
08:59Looking for Driver Pathways of Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapy: Drug Resistant Subclone Generation and Sensitivity Restoring by Gene Knock-down
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists