Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

5.7K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.7K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.5K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

32
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
32
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

158
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
158
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.3K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.3K
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

156
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
156

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An evaluation of computational methods for aggregate data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

BMC medical research methodology·2024
Same author

An empirical comparison of statistical methods for multiple cut-off diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) depression screening tool using published results vs individual participant data.

BMC medical research methodology·2024
Same author

Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression: updated systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2021
Same author

Validation of the COVID-19 Fears Questionnaires for Chronic Medical Conditions: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network COVID-19 Cohort study.

Journal of psychosomatic research·2020
Same author

Robust bivariate random-effects model for accommodating outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Statistical methods in medical research·2020
Same author

Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K

A Bivariate Finite Mixture Random Effects Model for Identifying and Accommodating Outliers in Diagnostic Test

Zelalem F Negeri1

  • 1Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|June 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Outlying studies in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses can mislead. A new robust finite mixture model identifies outlier probabilities, providing reliable pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords:
bivariate finite mixture modeldiagnostic test accuracymeta‐analysisoutlier detection and accommodationsensitivity and specificity

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.8K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.8K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Informatics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Outlying studies are common in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses.
  • Existing methods for handling outliers dichotomize studies and focus only on summary sensitivity and specificity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a robust random-effects bivariate finite mixture model for meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
  • To account for within- and across-study heterogeneity and assess outlier impact.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a random-effects bivariate finite mixture model.
  • Model generates outlier probabilities for each study.
  • Assesses impact on pooled sensitivity, specificity, and heterogeneity.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model is robust to outliers.
  • It provides precise point and interval estimates for pooled sensitivity and specificity.
  • Results align with standard models when no outliers are present.

Conclusions:

  • The new model offers a flexible and robust approach to meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
  • It can be used as a standalone or sensitivity analysis tool when outliers are suspected.