Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Habitat Fragmentation02:31

Habitat Fragmentation

17.4K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
17.4K
Ecological Niches02:02

Ecological Niches

23.6K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
23.6K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temperature- and species-specific infection could modify stream insect communities.

Current microbiology·2026
Same author

Two wild carnivores selectively forage for prey but not amino acids.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Selecting and applying indicators of ecosystem collapse for risk assessments.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

6.9K

Method matters: Comparing habitat- and process-based approaches for favorability assessment.

Galen Holt1, Georgia K Dwyer1, Rebecca E Lester1

  • 1Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Ecological Applications : a Publication of the Ecological Society of America
|June 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Habitat-based and process-based modeling approaches yield different assessments of favorable areas for woody vegetation. Comparing these methods can reveal potential species range shifts, but they are not interchangeable.

Keywords:
ecohydrology, Murray–Darling Basinecological responseshabitat modelsmanagement modelingprocess‐based modelswetland vegetation

More Related Videos

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.3K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

6.9K
Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.3K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Environmental modeling
  • Conservation biology

Background:

  • Environmental conditions and habitat types are often used as proxies for ecological outcomes.
  • Process-based models offer an alternative by incorporating physical drivers and life-cycle events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare habitat-based and process-based modeling approaches for identifying favorable areas for four iconic woody vegetation species.
  • To assess the congruence and discrepancies between the two modeling methods.

Main Methods:

  • Modeled four woody vegetation species in the Murray-Darling Basin.
  • Applied a habitat-based approach using inundation of associated wetland types.
  • Utilized a process-based approach modeling life cycles dependent on inundation and soil moisture.

Main Results:

  • The habitat-based approach provided a fundamentally different assessment compared to the process-based approach.
  • Favorable areas identified by each method often did not overlap spatially.
  • Many locations were deemed favorable by one method but not the other.

Conclusions:

  • The two modeling approaches are not equivalent and produce distinct outcomes.
  • Careful selection of the appropriate method is crucial for specific ecological applications.
  • Comparing methods can highlight areas of potential species range contraction or expansion.