Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review
Drieda Zace1, Federico Semeraro2, Sebastian Schnaubelt3,4,5
1Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Artificial intelligence shows promise in predicting cardiac arrest and aiding resuscitation decisions. However, more prospective studies are needed to confirm improved patient outcomes and clinical integration of these AI tools.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Research
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored for improving outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA).
- The current landscape and specific applications of AI in resuscitation are not well-defined.
- Understanding AI's role in CA is crucial for advancing emergency medical care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of AI applications in cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
- To identify existing research, methodologies, and outcomes associated with AI in resuscitation.
- To pinpoint research gaps for future investigation in AI-driven resuscitation strategies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.
- Adherence to PRISMA-ScR framework and ILCOR guidelines for comprehensive review.
- Screening and classification of AI applications by methodology, study design, outcomes, and setting, with AI-assisted data extraction validated manually.
Main Results:
- 197 studies were included, predominantly retrospective (90%), with limited prospective trials (16) and randomized controlled trials (2).
- AI was mainly used for CA prediction, rhythm classification, and post-resuscitation prognostication, with machine learning being the most common method (50%).
- High reported performance (AUROC > 0.85) was noted, but external validation and real-world implementation were scarce.
Conclusions:
- AI demonstrates potential in prediction and decision support for resuscitation, but evidence for improved patient outcomes is limited.
- Current clinical use of AI in resuscitation is not widespread.
- Future research should prioritize prospective validation, data equity, AI explainability, and clinical workflow integration.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

