Addressing knowledge, attitude and practice gaps for effective dengue management strategies in Indonesia
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.This study assessed Indonesian adults' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dengue. Findings reveal higher attitudes and practices than knowledge, highlighting gaps for integrated dengue management strategies.
Area Of Science
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Diseases
Background
- Dengue poses a significant public health challenge in Indonesia with a substantial disease burden.
- Limited comprehensive assessments of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) regarding dengue exist for the Indonesian adult population.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate KAP regarding dengue in Indonesian adults.
- To inform integrated dengue management programs in Indonesia.
Main Methods
- Cross-sectional electronic survey (GEMKAP study) conducted in September-October 2022.
- Survey targeted 600 Indonesian adults aged 21-60, using 35 questions translated into Bahasa Indonesia.
Main Results
- Adults demonstrated higher Attitudes (65%) and Practices (56%) than Knowledge (46%) regarding dengue.
- Awareness of dengue serotypes and multiple infection risks was low (48% and 50%).
- Integrated dengue management combining vaccination, education, and vector control was favored; doctors were the most trusted information source (94%).
Conclusions
- KAP assessment revealed strengths and gaps in dengue awareness and practices among Indonesians.
- An integrated approach combining vector control, vaccination, and education is needed.
- Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are crucial for implementing effective dengue management strategies.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...