Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-guided Biliary Drainage with Duckbill-type Anti-reflux Metal Stent versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Hepaticogastrostomy for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction in Pancreatic Cancer with Duodenal Invasion

  • 0Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Transpapillary biliary drainage with anti-reflux metal stents (ARMS) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) showed comparable outcomes for managing malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) in patients with duodenal invasion. D-ARMS is a viable option, particularly in non-high-volume centers.

Area Of Science

  • Gastroenterology
  • Interventional Endoscopy
  • Oncology

Background

  • Duodenal invasion in pancreatic cancer increases the risk of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) due to duodenobiliary reflux.
  • Transpapillary biliary drainage with anti-reflux metal stents (ARMS) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) are key management strategies.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of duckbill-type ARMS (D-ARMS) versus EUS-HGS in managing malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) in patients with duodenal invasion.

Main Methods

  • Retrospective review of unresectable pancreatic cancer patients with duodenal invasion undergoing D-ARMS or EUS-HGS.
  • Comparison of technical/clinical success, RBO causes, adverse events (AEs), time to RBO (TRBO), and endoscopic reintervention (ERI).

Main Results

  • No significant differences in technical/clinical success rates between D-ARMS (n=22) and EUS-HGS (n=22).
  • Non-RBO AE rates were 9.1% for D-ARMS vs. 36.4% for EUS-HGS (p=0.069).
  • Overall RBO rates, median TRBO, and ERI outcomes were comparable between groups.

Conclusions

  • Transpapillary biliary drainage using D-ARMS is a viable option for MDBO with duodenal invasion.
  • D-ARMS may be particularly suitable for non-high-volume centers when technically feasible.