Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Isolation and Identification of Waterborne Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Molecular Characterization of their Antibiotic Resistance Genes
Published on: March 3, 2023
The emerging concern of IMP variants being resistant to the only IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase inhibitor,
Christophe Le Terrier1,2,3, Salvador I Drusin4,5, Patrice Nordmann1,6
1Medical and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) of IMP type are not inhibited by currently commercialized β-lactamase inhibitors, including taniborbactam (TAN), which inhibits only NDM- and VIM-type enzymes. However, the development of xeruborbactam (XER), which additionally inhibits IMP enzymes, may provide effective drug combinations such as meropenem-XER (MEM-XER) against most MBL producers. Thirty-two IMP-producing clinical gram-negative isolates were tested for MEM-XER. Susceptibility testing of β-lactams with TAN or XER at 4 or 8 µg/mL was performed. Noticeably, MEM-XER remained ineffective against all IMP-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. By contrast, supplementation with XER significantly lowered MEM MICs for several IMP-producing Enterobacterales isolates, except for isolates and recombinant E. coli strains producing IMP-6, IMP-10, IMP-14, and IMP-26. Interestingly, IMP-59 producers showed susceptibility to both TAN- and XER-based combinations, although IMP enzymes are not supposed to be inhibited by TAN. Determinations of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of XER showed values being >15-fold higher for IMP-6, IMP-10, IMP-14, and IMP-26 compared with IMP-1. Interestingly, the IC50 value of TAN for IMP-59 was found in the same range as that for NDM-1 (7 µM). Finally, structural analyses and molecular modeling simulations indicated that the Ser262Gly mutation in IMP-6 may alter the electronic properties of the active site, whereas the Phe residue in IMP-10 may exert a steric effect counteracting XER binding. Resistance to XER in IMP-6, IMP-10, IMP-14, and IMP-26 variants, conferring resistance to MEM-XER, might be considered a serious concern since MEM-XER will be supposed to be a salvage therapy for MBL-, and especially IMP-producing Enterobacterales infections.
Insights
New drug combinations like meropenem-xeruborbactam (MEM-XER) show promise against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producing bacteria. However, certain IMP-type MBLs, particularly in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, remain resistant, posing a significant challenge for future treatments.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are critical resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria.
- Existing β-lactamase inhibitors like taniborbactam (TAN) do not cover IMP-type MBLs.
- Xeruborbactam (XER) offers expanded coverage, including IMP enzymes, enabling novel combination therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of meropenem-xeruborbactam (MEM-XER) against clinical isolates producing IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases.
- To identify specific IMP variants and bacterial species that remain resistant to MEM-XER.
- To investigate the molecular basis for resistance to XER in certain IMP-type MBL producers.
Main Methods:
- Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 32 IMP-producing Gram-negative isolates against MEM-XER.
- Determination of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for XER and TAN against various IMP variants.
- Structural analysis and molecular modeling to elucidate resistance mechanisms.
Main Results:
- MEM-XER was ineffective against all tested IMP-producing *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* isolates.
- XER supplementation reduced meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in many *Enterobacterales* isolates, but not those producing IMP-6, IMP-10, IMP-14, and IMP-26.
- IMP-59 producers showed susceptibility to both TAN- and XER-based combinations.
- Molecular modeling suggested specific mutations (e.g., Ser262Gly in IMP-6) and residues (e.g., Phe in IMP-10) hinder XER binding.
Conclusions:
- MEM-XER demonstrates potential as a salvage therapy for certain IMP-producing *Enterobacterales* infections.
- The emergence of resistance to XER in specific IMP variants (IMP-6, IMP-10, IMP-14, IMP-26) is a significant clinical concern.
- Further research is needed to develop inhibitors effective against all MBL types, including these resistant IMP variants.
More Related Videos
06:42Author Spotlight: Exploring the Antibacterial Effects of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Overcoming Antibiotic Resistance
Published on: September 27, 2024
09:26Identification of Antibacterial Immunity Proteins in Escherichia coli using MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS/MS and Top-Down Proteomic Analysis
Published on: May 23, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Antimicrobial Proteins
Interferons
Interferons (IFNs) are proteins produced by lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts infected with viruses. While IFNs cannot prevent viruses from entering and...
Antibiotic Selection
Gene Regulation in Microbial Communities: Quorum Sensing