Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Using Nicotine in a Silica-Exposed Mouse Model to Promote Lung Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
Published on: March 3, 2023
Empowering safety managers to champion the implementation of smoking cessation services in the construction industry:
Taghrid Asfar1,2, David J Lee1,2, Ramzi G Salloum3
1Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Abstract:
US construction workers (CWs) have the highest cigarette smoking rate among all occupations (27.2% vs. 15%), yet the lowest coverage of workplace smoking cessation services (14% vs. 29%). This study aims to empower safety managers to implement smoking cessation services in the construction industry. Using participatory research methods, this study aims to: 1) Develop multilevel strategies (MLIs) to implement adaptive smoking cessation programs delivered by the safety manager on construction sites, and 2) conduct a cluster-randomized, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation, 2-phase sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to test the programs (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06098144). The MLIs include: 1) creating the outer setting (research investigators, stakeholders) and inner setting facilitation (companies' advisory committee, study champion), 2) conducting observational field assessments of workflows, 3) training safety managers to deliver the intervention, and 4) conducting implementation process evaluations. In SMART, 32 construction sites within 8 companies with 608 CWs will be enrolled. In Phase 1, sites will be randomized to A1 (referral to Tobacco Quitline -TQL) or B1 (referral to TQL + nicotine replacement treatment (NRT) + 1 group behavioral counseling session). In Phase 2, responders who quit smoking at 3 months continue with the assessment only, while non-responders will be re-randomized to C (4 counseling sessions + NRT; A1 + C, B1 + C) or an extra dose of Phase 1 treatment (A2, B2). Participants will receive 4 follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Primary outcomes are the effectiveness (12-month biomarker-confirmed prolonged abstinence) and cost-effectiveness (cost/quit, cost/quality-adjusted life-year) of A1 + A2 vs. B1 + B2 and A1 + C vs. B1 + C. The secondary outcome is the feasibility of the program's implementation. We hypothesize that B1 + B2 will outperform A1 + A2, and B1 + C will outperform A1 + C. This project will generate novel scientific evidence on the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation feasibility of smoking cessation programs in the construction industry.
More Related Videos
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
10:37Automated Measurement of Pulmonary Emphysema and Small Airway Remodeling in Cigarette Smoke-exposed Mice
Published on: January 16, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...