Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Comparative Outcomes of Proton versus Photon Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast
Anshumi Desai1,2, Carolina Padilla3, Seraphina Choi2
1From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery.
Background:
The increasing popularity of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (PP-IBBR) and proton-based radiation (PRT) lacks outcomes data. The authors compared complications in PP-IBBR with photon-based radiation (XRT) versus PRT postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT).
Methods:
A single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and PP-IBBR with PMRT (January 2020 to October 2022) with 2-year follow-up after surgery. The authors assessed for minor infections (requiring oral antibiotics), major infections (requiring intravenous antibiotics), wound complications, flap necrosis, seromas, reoperations, capsular contracture, and implant failures (requiring implant removal for any of the aforementioned complications, except for rupture), including implant exposure.
Results:
A total of 116 patients with PP-IBBR receiving PMRT were analyzed, divided into 2 cohorts: XRT ( n = 75 [64.7%]) and PRT ( n = 41 [35.3%]). Overall, more complications occurred with XRT compared with PRT. Major infection, minor infection, delayed wound healing, partial flap necrosis, seroma development, reoperations, implant failure, and capsular contracture of all grades as well as grade III or IV capsular contracture were seen more with XRT compared with PRT. Compared with PRT, XRT was significantly associated with higher risk of 2 or more complications in univariable analysis (OR, 3.71 [95% CI, 1.02 to 13.53]; P = 0.047) and in the multivariable model adjusting for stage (OR, 4.84 [95% CI, 1.27 to 18.46]; P = 0.021). Compared with stages 1 and 2, stages 3 and 4 were significantly associated with higher risk of 2 or more complications (OR, 3.40 [95% CI, 1.21 to 9.57]; P = 0.021), adjusting for radiation type.
Conclusions:
Compared with traditional XRT, PRT was associated with fewer complications in patients with PP-IBBR. PRT is a safer option, warranting larger studies and broader utilization in clinical practice.
Clinical Question/Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic, III.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025