Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines
Published on: March 4, 2017
Nanomedicine in Cancer Therapeutics: Current Perspectives from Bench to Bedside
K M Abdullah1,2, Gunjan Sharma1,2, Ajay P Singh1,2
1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.
Abstract:
Cancer is among the leading causes of death worldwide, with projections indicating that it will claim 35 million lives by the year 2050. Conventional therapies, such as chemotherapy and immune modulation, have reduced cancer mortality to some extent; however, they have limited efficacy due to their broad mode of action, often resulting in cytotoxic effects on normal cells along with the malignant tissues, ultimately limiting their overall optimal therapeutic efficacy outcomes.Rapid advances in nanotechnology and an evolving understanding of cancer mechanisms have propelled the development of a diverse array of nanocarriers to vanquish the hurdles in achieving sophisticated drug delivery with reduced off-target toxicity. Nanoformulations can deliver the anti-cancer agents precisely to the tumor cell by integrating a multitarget approach that allows for tissue-, cell-, or organelle-specific delivery and internalization. Despite the immense interest and unmatched advancements in modern oncology equipped with nanomedicines, only a few nanoformulations have successfully translated into clinical settings. A major reason behind this shortcoming is the lack of a rationale design incorporating smart, responsive targeting features, leading to a compromised therapeutic window due to inefficient internalization or erroneous intracellular localization with unsuccessful payload release. This review aims to summarize the recent perspective of nanomedicine and its translation to clinical practice, with a particular focus on the evolution of strategies used in tumor targeting from traditional EPR-based passive mechanisms to advanced active and multi-stage approaches. We highlight the coupling of organelle-specific and stimuli-responsive nanocarriers, discuss the potential of biomimetic and cell-mediated delivery systems, and also shed light on technologies such as microfluidics, tumor-on-chip models, and AI-assisted synthesis. Finally, this review explores translational hurdles ranging from biological and manufacturing challenges to regulatory bottlenecks and outlines how innovative modeling systems and engineering solutions can bridge the gap from bench to bedside in cancer nanotherapeutics.
Insights
Nanomedicine offers targeted cancer therapy by overcoming limitations of conventional treatments. This review explores advanced nanocarrier strategies and translational challenges for effective cancer nanotherapeutics.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nanotechnology
- Drug Delivery
Background:
- Cancer remains a leading global cause of death, with conventional therapies showing limited efficacy due to off-target toxicity.
- Nanotechnology advancements enable sophisticated nanocarriers for precise anti-cancer agent delivery, reducing side effects.
- Despite progress, few nanomedicines have translated to clinical practice due to design and targeting challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review nanomedicine's current perspective and clinical translation in cancer therapy.
- To highlight the evolution of tumor targeting strategies from passive to active and multi-stage approaches.
- To discuss challenges and innovative solutions for bridging the gap from research to clinical application.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on nanomedicine in oncology.
- Analysis of traditional (EPR-based) versus advanced nanocarrier targeting strategies.
- Exploration of enabling technologies like microfluidics, tumor-on-chip models, and AI-assisted synthesis.
Main Results:
- Nanoformulations offer precise tumor cell delivery via multitargeting and specific internalization.
- Advanced strategies include organelle-specific, stimuli-responsive, biomimetic, and cell-mediated delivery systems.
- Innovative technologies like microfluidics and AI-assisted synthesis are emerging.
Conclusions:
- Rational design of nanocarriers with smart, responsive targeting is crucial for improved therapeutic windows.
- Overcoming biological, manufacturing, and regulatory hurdles is essential for clinical translation.
- Engineering solutions and innovative models can accelerate the development of cancer nanotherapeutics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Tumor Immunotherapy

