Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
Applying Bias Correction Methods to Build Hybrid Controls Using Real-World Patients for a Phase IIb Randomized
Heather J Litman1, Kristin M Sheffield2, Oksana Pugach1
1CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Two methods combining randomized controlled trial (RCT) and real-world (RW) data successfully replicated baricitinib
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Data Science
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) face challenges when incorporating real-world (RW) patients due to potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding.
- Hybrid control arms, combining RCT controls with eligible RW patients, offer a potential solution to enhance generalizability.
- Evaluating methods to construct these hybrid arms is crucial for robust clinical trial evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess two methods, Match, Test-then-Pool (MTP) and Matching and Bias Adjustment (MBA), for constructing a hybrid control arm.
- To replicate the treatment effect of baricitinib on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outcomes using this hybrid approach.
- To compare the performance of MTP and MBA in a moderately to severely active RA population.
Main Methods:
- Utilized concurrent RCT control patients and trial-eligible RW patients from the CorEvitas Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.
- Applied optimal propensity score (PS) matching to create comparable control groups.
- MTP involved replacing RCT controls with RW controls and testing for outcome differences before pooling; MBA adjusted for residual differences between RCT and RW controls.
Main Results:
- Both MTP and MBA methods successfully replicated the original RCT's findings for baricitinib's treatment effect on ACR20 response and CDAI change.
- Optimal matching resulted in a RW cohort with good covariate balance compared to RCT participants.
- The odds ratio for ACR20 was 4.71 (MTP) and 4.76 (MBA), closely mirroring the RCT's 4.74.
- Mean CDAI change was -8.96 (MTP) and -9.85 (MBA), consistent with the RCT's -8.88.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid control arms constructed using MTP or MBA, combining well-matched RW data with RCT controls, can effectively replicate Phase IIb trial results.
- These methods provide a viable strategy to enhance the generalizability of RCT findings by incorporating real-world evidence.
- The study demonstrates the successful application of advanced statistical techniques in real-world data analysis for rheumatoid arthritis.
More Related Videos
07:44Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
Published on: July 14, 2023
04:50Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025