Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Impact of care fragmentation on survival in locally advanced rectal cancer: Identifying vulnerable populations
Daniel Aryeh Metzger1, Haley Harris1, Isabelle Tan1
1Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Background:
Treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer requires multidisciplinary coordination. Studies examining care fragmentation, in which a patient receives cancer treatment at multiple facilities, are limited. This study aimed to determine the demographic, clinical, and hospital subgroups impacted by care fragmentation.
Methods:
Patients with stage II-III rectal cancer treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation (2009-2019) were selected from the National Cancer Database and divided into fragmented care and unified care groups. Overall survival was compared. Demographic, disease characteristic, and hospital type subgroups were analyzed to determine differential impact of care fragmentation.
Results:
In total, 63,299 patients were included, of whom 41,978 (66.3%) received fragmented care and 21,321 (33.7%) received unified care. Median age was 60 years (interquartile range, 51-68 years), and 62.2% were male. Overall, fragmented care was associated with shorter survival (P = .0017), increased treatment delays (13.7% vs 12.4% in unified care; P < .001) and decreased neoadjuvant therapies (P < .001). Fragmented care was significantly associated with decreased survival in 5 subgroups: female patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.152, P < .001), patients with clinical Stage III disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.094, P = .001), patients with Medicaid (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.212, P = .006), patients ≥100 miles from the hospital (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.377, P = .013), and patients treated at academic centers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.225, P < .001). Unified care at academic centers was associated with significantly improved overall survival compared to fragmented care at academic centers and treatment at nonacademic centers (P < .001).
Conclusions:
Care fragmentation is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with locoregional rectal cancer, with certain subgroups being particularly vulnerable. Addressing the socioeconomic and logistical barriers that contribute to care fragmentation will be crucial in improving patient outcomes.
