Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

10:19
3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents
Published on: August 3, 2019
10.6K
A comparative study of ANN-based forward dynamics and inverse dynamics in human gait analysis
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Journal of Biomechanics
|June 10, 2025
Summary
This study compares inverse and forward dynamics for analyzing human walking. Artificial Neural Network-based forward dynamics accurately models gait and provides more precise energy consumption estimates than traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Robotics
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Traditional inverse dynamics analysis of human motion relies on measured ground reaction forces and kinematic data.
- Forward dynamics simulations offer a more direct approach but require accurate models of muscle activation and control.
- Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) show promise in developing sophisticated controllers for forward dynamics simulations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of human walking motion analysis between traditional inverse dynamics and an ANN-based forward dynamics method.
- To evaluate the ANN controller's ability to reproduce accurate gait kinematics and joint torques.
- To assess differences in mechanical energy consumption estimation between the two dynamic modeling approaches.
Main Methods:
- Collected motion capture and ground reaction force data from nine healthy male subjects during walking.
- Performed inverse kinematics and dynamics analysis using OpenSim.
- Trained an ANN-based gait controller using deep reinforcement learning in forward dynamics simulations, optimizing for kinematic tracking and reduced joint torques/power fluctuations.
Main Results:
- The ANN controller reproduced joint kinematics with a root-mean-square (RMS) difference of less than 2.7° compared to inverse kinematics.
- Joint torque profiles from the ANN method showed RMS differences of 0.20-0.23 Nm/kg, comparable to optimization-based methods.
- Forward dynamics with the ANN controller estimated higher total mechanical power consumption (underestimating by only 4.1% with residuals) compared to inverse dynamics (underestimating by 0.74 W/kg due to residual forces).
Conclusions:
- ANN-based forward dynamics modeling can accurately replicate human gait kinematics and joint dynamics.
- This approach offers a more accurate estimation of mechanical energy consumption by minimizing reliance on residual forces.
- The adaptable ANN controller has potential applications in analyzing gait variations for rehabilitation and developing assistive robotic devices.

