Quantifying vessel noise and acoustic habitat loss in marine soundscapes

  • 1SoundSpace Analytics, 2845 Penrith Ave, Cumberland V0R 1S0, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: benhendricks@soundspace-analytics.ca.
  • 2Ocean Acoustics Ltd., 12 Muritai Road, Auckland 0620, New Zealand; Institute of Life and Earth Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: matt.pine@ocean-acoustics.com.
  • 3North Coast Cetacean Society, 26 Cottonwood Rd, Alert Bay, V0N1A0, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: grace@bcwhales.org.
  • 4Saturna Island Marine Research & Education Society, PO Box 117, 727 Trillium Trail, Saturna Island, V0N2Y0, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: maureen.welton@simres.ca.
  • 5Pacific Orca Society, PO Box 510, Alert Bay, V0N1A0, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: helena@orcalab.org.
  • 6Sea to Shore Systems Ltd., 1036 Clarke Rd, Brentwood Bay, V8M 1C7, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: tomdakin@seatoshoresystems.ca.
  • 7WWF-Canada, Resilient Habitats Program, 259-560 Johnson St., Victoria V8W 3C6, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: halidina@wwfcanada.org.
  • 8Gitga'at Oceans and Land Department, 455 Hayimiisaxaa Way, Hartley Bay, V0V1A0, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: chrispicard@gitgaat.ca.
  • 9North Coast Cetacean Society, 26 Cottonwood Rd, Alert Bay, V0N1A0, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: janie@bcwhales.org.

|

Abstract

Quantifying underwater vessel noise in marine ecosystems is challenging, due to difficulties in accounting for small, not publicly tracked boats, creating a knowledge gap in marine management. We present a computationally efficient framework that detects all vessel noise in hydrophone recordings and quantifies associated excess noise levels as well as acoustic habitat loss, offering a cost-effective and replicable tool for assessing vessel noise effects on marine soundscapes. Applied to one year of acoustic data from five sites along the coast of British Columbia (BC), Canada, the detector achieved 96.4 % accuracy and was robust against varying levels of vessel traffic and weather conditions. Across sites, vessel noise impacts increased with proximity to urban centers. Following this trend, average annual vessel noise presence ranged between 24 % and 85 %, increasing the 500 Hz decidecade band by 1.0 dB to 6.4 dB across sites. The average year-round acoustic habitat loss for killer whales, expressed as the reduction of listening space in a 0.5-15 kHz communication band, ranged from 6.6 % to 46.9 %. Vessel noise impacts were generally higher during daylight hours and in the summer months. The results are the first comprehensive, empirical assessment of vessel presence and associated noise impacts for a regional ecosystem in BC.

Related Concept Videos

Habitat Fragmentation 02:31

17.4K

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.

Perforation and dissection often occur during the initial stages of...

Echo 01:06

493

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...

Sound Intensity Level 00:53

4.1K

Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...

Sound Intensity 00:58

4.0K

The loudness of a sound source is related to how energetically the source is vibrating, consequently making the molecules of the propagation medium vibrate. To measure the loudness of a source, the physical quantity of interest is the intensity. This is defined as the energy emitted per unit of time per unit of area perpendicular to the sound wave's propagation direction. Since the total energy is greater if the source vibrates for a longer duration and over a larger area, dividing the...

Deriving the Speed of Sound in a Liquid 01:09

482

As with waves on a string, the speed of sound or a mechanical wave in a fluid depends on the fluid's elastic modulus and inertia. The two relevant physical quantities are the bulk modulus and the density of the material. Indeed, it turns out that the relationship between speed and the bulk modulus and density in fluids is the same as that between the speed and the Young's modulus and density in solids.
The speed of sound in fluids can be derived by considering a mechanical wave...

Sound Waves: Interference 00:53

3.7K

Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...