Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Machine learning-based error detection in the clinical laboratory: a critical review
Yanchun Lin1, Isaiah K Mensah1, Michelle Doering2
1Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
None:
Laboratory test results play a crucial role in the modern medical decision-making process. As such, errors in any phase of the testing process can have substantial clinical and operational impacts. While the development of increasingly robust quality assurance systems has enhanced the reliability of laboratory results, opportunities for improvement still exist. Machine learning approaches offer the potential to evaluate complex patterns and discriminate physiological variation from laboratory errors. In this work, we critically evaluate the current state of published machine learning solutions to laboratory errors, while highlighting unmet needs and potential barriers to widespread implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics

