Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
Published on: April 7, 2020
No association between chronotype and cardiovascular response to a cognitive challenge in the morning using a
Larissa N Wüst1,2, Christian Cajochen1,2, Ruta Lasauskaite1,2
1Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract:
A chronotype is defined as a preference for certain behaviours (e.g., sleep and wake) to occur at specific times of day. It is therefore also temporally linked with cognitive performance across the day. In an exploratory analysis, we sought to find associations between chronotypes determined from self-reported habitual sleep timing and from salivary melatonin onset with mental effort during a 2-back working memory task. Mental effort was operationalized as sympathetic beta-adrenergic impact on the heart, which is best reflected by the cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) and also influences systolic blood pressure (SBP). Each participant underwent two experimental sessions in the morning: once after sleeping for 8 h and once after sleeping for 5 h the night before. To determine the timing of evening melatonin onset, participants took saliva samples at hourly intervals at home in the evening, prior to their experimental sessions. Chronotypes were determined using reported sleep times from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and average melatonin onset during both sleep conditions. Based on this, participants were grouped into early, intermediate, or late types. Neither alertness (BF 10 = 0.019), perceived task demand (BF 10 = 0.008), nor SBP response (BF 10 = 0.268) were credibly impacted by sleep-time derived chronotype, while the association with PEP response (BF 10 = 0.631) during a cognitive challenge in the morning was inconclusive. Similarly, the timing of evening melatonin onset did not affect alertness (BF 10 = 0.003), perceived task demand (BF 10 = 0.006), or PEP or SBP response (PEP: BF 10 = 0.232, SBP: BF 10 = 0.263) during the cognitive challenge. Our data shows no impact of chronotypes on effort-related cardiovascular response during a cognitive challenge in the morning, which was scheduled according to habitual sleep times.
More Related Videos
08:36Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments
Published on: August 8, 2019
08:08Eye Tracking, Cortisol, and a Sleep vs. Wake Consolidation Delay: Combining Methods to Uncover an Interactive Effect of Sleep and Cortisol on Memory
Published on: June 18, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
Correlation between ECG and Cardiac Cycle
A cardiac action potential originates in the SA node and spreads throughout the atria and the AV node in approximately 0.03 seconds. This results in the P wave in an ECG and triggers atrial contraction. The action potential is then briefly slowed at the AV node, allowing the atria to contract and fill the ventricles with blood before...