Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
20.3K
Comparing methods to improve cone-beam computed tomography for dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy
Casper Dueholm Vestergaard1,2, Nadine Vatterodt1,2, Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm1
1Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
|June 11, 2025
Summary
Synthetic CTs improve image quality for adaptive proton therapy. Four methods evaluated showed accurate dose calculation and anatomy preservation, making them valuable for head-and-neck cancer treatment planning.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy
- Image Processing
Background:
- Proton therapy dose monitoring relies on repeated CT scans, which may not reflect real-time anatomy.
- In-room cone-beam CT (CBCT) has lower image quality, limiting proton dose calculation accuracy.
- Adaptive proton therapy requires high-quality imaging for accurate dose monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate different quality-improvement methods for CBCTs (synthetic CTs; sCTs).
- To assess the suitability of sCTs for adaptive proton therapy in head-and-neck cancer patients.
- To compare the accuracy of sCTs against repeated CT scans for proton dose calculations.
Main Methods:
- Four sCT generation methods were assessed: intensity-correction, two deformable image registration, and deep learning-based.
- Thirty-five CBCTs from 24 head-and-neck cancer patients were used.
- sCTs were evaluated for CT number accuracy, proton range accuracy, and dose recalculation accuracy using DVH parameters compared to reCTs.
Main Results:
- All four sCT methods improved CBCT image quality while preserving anatomy.
- Proton range differences between sCT methods were small, often less than sCT vs. reCT differences (1.0-1.1 mm).
- DVH parameter differences were generally small between sCT methods, with outliers often consistent across methods.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated sCT methods enable accurate proton dose calculation.
- sCTs effectively preserve anatomical information for adaptive proton therapy.
- These sCT methods are valuable tools for adaptive proton therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Keywords:
Adaptive proton therapyCone-beam computed tomographyHead-and-neck cancerProton dose calculationSynthetic computed tomography
