Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MHub.ai: A Standardized Platform for Reproducible AI Research in Medical Imaging.

Research square·2026
Same author

Safety of home-based oral immunotherapy in highly-sensitized preschoolers with a simplified protocol.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Penicillin allergy de-labeling: Adaptation of risk stratification tool for patients and families" [World Allergy Organ J 17(8) (2024 Jul 23) 100939] doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100939. eCollection 2024 Aug.

The World Allergy Organization journal·2026
Same author

Face aging rate quantifies change in biological age to predict cancer outcomes.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Development and implementation of low-cost, grocery-sourced oral immunotherapy protocols.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2026
Same author

Opportunistic CT-Derived Periaortic Fat Attenuation as a Novel Marker of Mortality in Patients Undergoing TAVR.

JACC. Cardiovascular imaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
09:53

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.2K

Foundation model embeddings for quantitative tumor imaging biomarkers.

Hugo Aerts1, Suraj Pai1, Ibrahim Hadzic1

  • 1Mass General Brigham ∣ Harvard Medical School.

Research Square
|June 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Foundation models show varied performance in extracting cancer imaging phenotypes. TumorImagingBench offers a benchmark for evaluating these AI models in quantitative medical imaging tasks.

More Related Videos

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
06:44

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 7, 2020

7.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
09:53

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.2K
Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
06:44

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 7, 2020

7.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging
  • Quantitative Radiomics
  • Foundation Models

Background:

  • Foundation models are increasingly adopted in medical imaging.
  • Systematic evaluation of their ability to extract reliable quantitative radiographic phenotypes across diverse clinical contexts is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce TumorImagingBench, a benchmark for evaluating medical imaging foundation models.
  • Assess model performance in deriving deep learning-based radiographic phenotypes for cancer.
  • Compare model robustness, interpretability, and embedding similarity.

Main Methods:

  • Curated a benchmark (TumorImagingBench) with six public datasets (3,244 scans) and varied oncological endpoints.
  • Evaluated ten medical imaging foundation models (2020-2025) on performance, robustness, and interpretability.
  • Compared mutual similarity of learned embedding representations.

Main Results:

  • Revealed performance disparities among evaluated foundation models.
  • Demonstrated differences in robustness to common sources of variability.
  • Showcased variations in saliency-based interpretability and embedding similarity.

Conclusions:

  • The benchmark provides critical insights for selecting optimal foundation models for quantitative imaging tasks.
  • Highlights the need for systematic evaluation of AI models in medical imaging.
  • Public release of code, datasets, and results promotes reproducible research.