Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

The Colon-26 Carcinoma Tumor-bearing Mouse as a Model for the Study of Cancer Cachexia
Published on: November 30, 2016
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Association Between the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire and Cachexia in Patients With
Xi Zhang1,2,3, Xiang-Ting Dai1, Chao Wang1
1Department of Comprehensive Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Background:
Cancer cachexia is associated with poor quality of life (QoL) and reduced survival in patients with cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 is a widely used cancer-specific health-related QoL questionnaire that comprises 15 scales, consisting of five multi-item functional scales, three multi-item symptom scales, six single-item symptom scales and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Our study aimed to analyse the association of each scale in the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire with cachexia and explore its influence on survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer and cachexia.
Methods:
This multicentre cohort study enrolled 3158 patients with gastric cancer, among whom 1711 were diagnosed with cachexia. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the individual scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire significantly affected by cachexia. The Cox model was employed to evaluate the prognostic performance of EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire scales in patients with gastric cancer and cachexia.
Results:
In this study, the median age of patients with gastric cancer was 67.00 (interquartile range [IQR], 58.00-74.00) years, with 2178 (69.0%) men and 980 (31.0%) women. In logistic regression analyses, scales such as physical function (p < 0.001), global quality of life (p = 0.022), fatigue (p < 0.001), nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001), dyspnoea (p = 0.004), insomnia (p = 0.007), loss of appetite (p < 0.001), constipation (p < 0.001), diarrhoea (p = 0.017) and summary score (p = 0.039) were significantly associated with cachexia in patients with gastric cancer. According to the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, loss of appetite was the most significant scale associated with cachexia. Based on multivariate Cox analyses, the scales of physical function (HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.00-1.77, p = 0.049), role function (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.15-1.90, p = 0.002), social function (HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.40-2.56, p < 0.001), global quality of life (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.05-2.00, p = 0.026), financial impact (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.15-2.03, p = 0.003) and summary score (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.01-1.91, p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for survival in patients with gastric cancer and cachexia. The concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC) value for survival prediction were the highest for the social function scale.
Conclusion:
The QoL of gastric cancer patients with cachexia was significantly reduced. Certain scales in the EORTC QLQ-C30 were significantly associated with cachexia, especially the loss of appetite scale, and survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer, especially social function. Emphasizing these scales can heighten our awareness of the impact of cachexia on QoL and enhance our ability to predict the survival of patients with gastric cancer and cachexia.
Trial Registration:
ChiCTR: 1800020329.
More Related Videos
07:32Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups