A multi-species model for goose management: Competition and facilitation drive space use of foraging geese

  • 1Quantitative Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 17, 3584 CD, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.dejager@uu.nl.
  • 2Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. m.dejager@uu.nl.
  • 3Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • 4Fauna Management Unit Noord-Holland, Spaarne 13, 2011 CD, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
  • 5Environmental Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research, Postbus 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • 6Dutch Centre For Field Ornithology (Sovon), Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • 7Institute for Waterbird and Wetlands Research (IWWR) Germany e.V., Am Steigbügel 3, 27283, Verden (Aller), Lower Saxony, Germany.
  • 8Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Am Obstberg 1, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.
  • 9Ecology Department, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences (RIBES), Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • 10Wageningen Environmental Reserach (WEnR), Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • 11Institute for Avian Research, An Der Vogelwarte 21, 26386, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
  • 12Department of Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
+

|

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflicts are generally tackled using single-species studies and ensuing management solutions, ignoring species interactions that may moderate or augment these issues. We investigate the effects of interactions between four goose species foraging in the province of Friesland, the Netherlands, on species distributions, energetics, and consequent economic costs of agricultural damages and management, using an individual-based model. In Friesland, geese are allowed to graze on (semi-)natural grasslands and selected agricultural grasslands (accommodation areas), while they are scared off other agricultural grasslands (scaring areas). We show that interspecific competition and facilitation drive spatial redistribution of goose species. With increasing population sizes, most species are forced to increase foraging in the scaring areas, leading to more scaring events and more additional foraging to compensate for energy spent on fleeing behaviour. Our modelling results underline that careful consideration should be given to how management may affect the spatial distribution of foraging geese.

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging 00:48

12.0K

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Optimal foraging theory states that natural selection favors foraging strategies that balance the benefits of a particular food, such as energy and nutrients, with the costs of obtaining it, such as energy expenditure and the risk of predation. Optimal foraging maximizes benefits while minimizing costs.

For the Crows

Competition 02:34

21.5K

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.

Intraspecific competition, which occurs between individuals of the same species, serves as a natural mechanism for regulating population size. Too much...

Ecological Niches 02:02

23.6K

All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.

Multiple species cannot occupy the exact same niche within their habitat. If the niches of two or more species overlap to a large extent, the competitive exclusion principle dictates that one species will outcompete the...

Conservation of Declining Populations 02:07

9.6K

Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.

Conservation efforts often utilize scientific approaches to identify the reasons, or the agents, causing the population to decline. This approach then devises steps to remove, oppose, or neutralize the agents.

Conservation efforts may also introduce a test group to determine the probable cause of the decline. The...

Symbiosis 00:58

27.5K

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...

What are Populations and Communities? 00:30

33.8K

Overview

Populations are groups of individuals of the same species that inhabit a shared environment. Communities include multiple co-existing, interacting populations of different species. Metapopulations span multiple populations of the same species that occupy different areas. Metapopulations interact through immigration and emigration, providing genetic diversity that lends resilience to harsh environments. Population size and density can be estimated using quadrat and mark and recapture...