Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
Published on: February 20, 2021
Quantification and comparison of the reference dose measurements using IAEA TRS-398 protocols and its revised version
Mohammad Abdul Fatha1, Sathiya Raj2, Y S Pawar3
1RadiationPhysics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India. abdulfatha4698@gmail.com.
This study compared the International Atomic Energy Agency
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Dosimetry
Background:
- The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) established Technical Report Series (TRS-398) for absorbed dose measurement in external radiotherapy.
- TRS-398 offers a standardized method for using calibrated ionization chambers traceable to metrology institutes to determine absorbed dose to water.
- Accurate dosimetry is crucial for effective and safe radiotherapy treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare reference dosimetry, specifically dose at 10 cm depth (D10), between the original TRS-398 protocol and its revised version.
- To evaluate the impact of using different ionization chambers and beam types on dosimetry comparisons.
- To assess the influence of the absorbed dose conversion factor (kQ,QO) on measurement accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Reference dosimetry was performed for flattened (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams (6, 10, 15 MV) using both TRS-398 and its revised version.
- Two IBA ionization chambers (0.65 cm³ FC65-G and 0.13 cm³ CC13) with traceable calibration coefficients were employed.
- Absorbed dose to water (Dw) standards were used for calibration.
Main Results:
- Differences in D10 between the protocols ranged from 0.03% to 0.63% for the FC65-G chamber and -0.40% to -0.77% for the CC13 chamber.
- The revised protocol showed variations up to 0.63% (FC65-G) and -0.77% (CC13) compared to the old TRS-398.
- Using the old kQ,QO value led to an average overestimation of 0.5% and an underestimation of up to -0.77% depending on the chamber and beam type.
Conclusions:
- The revised TRS-398 protocol impacts reference dose measurements, with variations observed depending on the ionization chamber and beam characteristics.
- The choice of kQ,QO value significantly affects dosimetry accuracy, potentially leading to over or underestimation of the absorbed dose.
- Adherence to the revised protocol is recommended for accurate and consistent radiotherapy dosimetry.
More Related Videos
10:33Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...