Screening Blood and Vitreous for Biomarkers Associated with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Background/Objectives: Uncontrolled or long-standing diabetes can lead to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), a condition that significantly impairs vision. A subset of patients does not respond adequately to conventional therapies, such as intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or laser treatment. This study aims to identify potential biomarkers for alternative treatment pathways in the vitreous and blood of patients with severe PDR. Methods: Vitreous samples were collected from PDR patients (n = 3) undergoing vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage and from control patients (n = 9) undergoing ocular surgery for epiretinal membrane or macular holes. Blood samples were collected from a separate group of PDR patients (n = 13) and non-diabetic control patients without retinopathy (n = 13). Medical histories were obtained. Two-stage real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to evaluate mRNA expression levels of genes potentially implicated in PDR, including HIF2A, PAI-1, TIE1, TIE2, ANGPT2, and VEGFA. Molecular and statistical analyses were performed to compare PDR and control vitreous and blood samples. Results: The PDR vitrectomy group included two females and one male, aged 71-77 years (mean 74 years). All participants had undergone pan-retinal photocoagulation and two had received anti-VEGF injections before vitrectomy. These participants had elevated HbA1c levels. Targeted vitreous gene analysis revealed varying levels of increased expression of all genes examined as compared to the control group. A trend for increased median expression was demonstrated for all examined genes: HIF2A by 1.44-fold (PDR = 2.50, control = 1.74, p = 0.21), PAI-1 by 1.56-fold (PDR = 3.00, control = 1.93, p = 0.37), TIE1 by 1.36-fold (PDR = 2.33, control = 1.72, p = 0.66), TIE2 by 2.06-fold (PDR = 2.81, control = 1.36, p = 0.51), ANGPT2 by 2.93-fold (PDR = 6.32, control = 2.16, p = 0.1), and VEGFA by 3.53-fold (PDR = 3.51, control = 0.99, p = 0.08). PDR blood sample analysis as compared to controls showed a trend for increased expression of VEGFA by 1.2-fold (PDR = 0.88, control = 0.74, p = 0.57), whereas the other examined genes showed a trend of reduced expression; HIF2A decreased by 0.50-fold (PDR = 0.38, control = 0.75, p = 0.07), PAI by 0.51-fold (PDR = 0.35, control = 0.69, p = 0.09), TIE-1 by 0.79-fold (PDR = 0.79, control = 1.00, p = 0.54), TIE-2 by 0.70-fold (PDR = 0.58, control = 0.82, p = 0.34), and ANGPT2 by 0.45-fold (PDR = 0.51, control = 1.15, p = 0.11). Conclusions: Vitreous sample analysis revealed a trend of increased mRNA expression of ANGPT2 and VEGFA in patients with PDR. Blood sample analysis did not show a significant increase of VEGFA mRNA expression but a decreased trend of HIF2A, PAI-1, and ANGPT2 mRNA expression. These trends warrant validation in a larger cohort to explore alternative pathways for targeted treatment.