Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021
Comparison of Erlotinib vs. Osimertinib for Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Fernando M Runzer-Colmenares1, Rossana Ruiz2,3, Lorenzo Maco4,5
1CHANGE Research Working Group, Carrera de Medicina Humana, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru.
Abstract:
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of lung cancer cases globally and most patients receive their diagnosis at advanced or metastatic disease stages. The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib (first-generation) and osimertinib (third-generation) to treat NSCLC is possible because of activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Although osimertinib has shown better results in recent trials, direct and updated comparisons with erlotinib, especially in combination regimens, are still limited. Background/Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of osimertinib versus erlotinib, both as monotherapies and in combination, in treatment-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA-NMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025649761). PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched up to February 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared erlotinib- or osimertinib-based regimens in previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events. A frequentist random-effects model was used, and treatments were ranked using p-scores. Results: Eleven RCTs (2341 patients) were included. Osimertinib, alone or with chemotherapy, resulted in significantly longer OS compared to erlotinib-based regimens (HR for OS vs. erlotinib: 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.31). All osimertinib and erlotinib regimens outperformed chemotherapy for PFS, but no statistically significant differences were observed between osimertinib and erlotinib. Severe adverse events were comparable, though osimertinib ranked highest for safety. The combination of osimertinib with chemotherapy achieved the highest p-scores for both OS and PFS. Conclusions: Osimertinib is associated with superior overall survival and comparable safety versus erlotinib-based strategies in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. These findings reinforce osimertinib as the preferred first-line option in this setting.
Insights
Osimertinib significantly improves overall survival for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer compared to erlotinib. This study found comparable safety profiles, reinforcing osimertinib as a preferred first-line treatment option.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer death, with most diagnoses at advanced stages.
- Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations drive NSCLC, making tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) a key treatment modality.
- While third-generation TKIs like osimertinib show promise, direct comparisons with first-generation TKIs such as erlotinib, especially in combination therapies, are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib versus erlotinib.
- To evaluate both monotherapies and combination regimens in treatment-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
- To provide updated evidence for first-line treatment selection in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA-NMA guidelines.
- Searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to February 2025.
- Analyzed outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and severe adverse events (Grade ≥ 3) using a frequentist random-effects model.
Main Results:
- Eleven RCTs involving 2341 patients were included in the analysis.
- Osimertinib-based regimens demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to erlotinib-based regimens (HR 1.59).
- While all TKI regimens improved PFS over chemotherapy, no significant differences were found between osimertinib and erlotinib. Osimertinib showed a trend towards better safety, with the combination of osimertinib and chemotherapy achieving the highest rankings for OS and PFS.
Conclusions:
- Osimertinib-based strategies offer superior overall survival compared to erlotinib-based strategies in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
- Safety profiles were comparable, with a slight advantage for osimertinib.
- These findings support osimertinib as the preferred first-line treatment option for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle