Adjusting LCA Allocation Methods for Cement Industry: A Production-Based Approach to Energy Conservation and Emission...

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an excellent tool for developing energy saving and emission reduction strategies. However, inconsistencies in the summary calculation methods in LCA can significantly affect the reliability of LCA reports, such as the allocation of environmental loads related to solid waste. Essentially, allocation methods are used to allocate responsibility for environmental loads in situations where boundaries are unclear, and therefore, they are susceptible to regional, industry, and regulatory influences. For a long time, there has been controversy over the selection of allocation methods. This study is based on actual production data from a typical cement plant in South China. Multiple parallel LCA cases were carried out using different allocation methods, and different allocation methods were analyzed. Concepts such as driving force, active/passive environmental load, Valorized Solid Waste (VSW), and Non-Valorized Solid Waste (NVSW) were introduced. Analysis shows that the choice of allocation method directly affects the effectiveness of energy saving and emission reduction plans in the LCA report. For VSW, the economic allocation method has been proven to have high universality, effectively capturing the driving forces of economic factors. For NVSW, based on the "polluter pays principle" and active/passive environmental load, we introduced the Collaborative Disposal Allocation Method (CD method). In this study, the environmental benefits of domestic waste collaborative disposal were calculated using the CD method, resulting in a 2.25% reduction in global warming potential (GWP) and a 45.39% reduction in respiratory inorganics (RIs).