The Rising Importance of Research Output in ENT Residency Applications Without Numeric Step 1 Scores

  • 0Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology +

|

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends in research output (RO) among otolaryngology residency applicants following the transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to pass/fail scoring, and to explore implications for equity and applicant experience.

METHOD

This commentary analyzes publicly available data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Charting Outcomes in the Match reports from 2016 to 2022. The focus is on the average number of abstracts, presentations, and publications reported by matched and unmatched otolaryngology applicants.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2022, the average number of research items reported by matched applicants increased from 8.4 to 17.2. In 2022, unmatched applicants reported an average of 11.0 items-similar to what matched applicants reported in 2020. This upward trend appears to align with the announcement and implementation of Step 1 pass/fail scoring.

DISCUSSION

The increase in RO suggests that both programs and applicants are adapting to Step 1's scoring change by placing greater emphasis on scholarly productivity. However, this shift raises concerns about equity. Applicants without access to a home otolaryngology department or robust research infrastructure may face barriers to mentorship and publication opportunities. Financial costs associated with research presentation and the pressure to start research early in medical school further compound these disparities. The otolaryngology community must critically assess how RO is valued in the application process and develop strategies to ensure fair, meaningful engagement across diverse educational settings.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches 01:23

124

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Regression Toward the Mean 01:52

6.3K

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...

Reliability and Validity 01:29

12.7K

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. To illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen...

Review and Preview 01:10

6.9K

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...