Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Success of Ultrasound-Guided Neuraxial Anesthesia in Cases with Difficult Anatomy
Published on: January 31, 2025
Results of cervical epidural steroid injections based on the physician referral source
Josh Levin1,2, Nolan Gall1, John Chan1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St., Pavilion C, 4th Floor, MC 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063, United States.
Background:
Many patients who receive cervical epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are referred for the injection from a physician who does not perform the procedure.
Purpose:
To compare success rates of fluoroscopically-guided cervical ESIs in patients who had a clinical evaluation and recommendation for the injection by a fellowship-trained spine specialist who routinely performs ESIs (Group A), vs those who had a clinical evaluation by a fellowship-trained spine specialist who referred the patient for the procedure to be done by a different physician (Group B).
Study Design/Setting:
Retrospective, observational, in vivo study of consecutive patients. Patient Sample. Patients undergoing cervical transforaminal (TF) or interlaminar (IL) ESIs at a single outpatient academic spine center.
Outcome Measures:
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score improvement.
Methods:
Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were used to search all consecutive patients who received a cervical TF or IL ESI between January 2010 and October 2018. All patients with pre and post-injection NRS pain scores within 60 days of the injection were included in the analysis.
Results:
A total of 363 ESIs were analyzed (178 TF and 185 IL). 275 patients were evaluated and referred for the injection by a spine specialist who performs these procedures (Group A), and 88 were evaluated and referred by a spine specialist who does not perform these procedures (Group B). Success was defined as > 50% improvement in the NRS pain score. 52% [95% CI: 47-57%] of all patients who received a cervical ESI achieved a successful outcome. There were better results in Group A with a 57% [95% CI: 51-63%] success rate compared to a 38% [95% CI: 28-48%] success rate in Group B. Group A also had a higher proportion of patients who achieved at least 80% pain relief (31% [95% CI: 26-36%]) compared to Group B (17% [95% CI: 9-25%]).
Conclusion:
This retrospective study demonstrated better results from cervical ESIs when patients were referred for the injection by a physician who performs ESIs. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia

