Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Bibliometric Analysis in Hyperhidrosis: Recent Publication Trends from 2015 to 2025
Aditya Joshi1,2, David J Griego2, Lauren Gawey1
1Department of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Introduction:
Hyperhidrosis is a chronic dermatologic condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While research has expanded in recent years, bibliometric analyses exploring publication trends remain limited. This study examined the 100 most-cited articles from 2015 to 2025 to assess research priorities.
Methods:
A Scopus search was conducted on January 2, 2025, using the terms "hyperhidrosis", "primary hyperhidrosis", "secondary hyperhidrosis", and "excessive sweating". Non-English, abstract-only, and non-hyperhidrosis focused articles were excluded. Two reviewers screened and identified the 100 most-cited publications. Data were analyzed for publication year, authorship, country, study design, journal, and topic focus. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Level of Evidence (LoE) framework was used to assess study quality.
Results:
The majority (76%) of highly cited articles were published between 2015 and 2019. Randomized controlled trials (20%), cohort studies (18%), and case-control studies (16%) were the most common study types. Using LoE assessment, 33% of studies were level 1 (high-quality evidence). Research on treatments (55%) dominated, followed by quality of life (12%) and outcome measures (11%). The USA led in publication output.
Conclusion:
This bibliometric analysis identifies evolving research priorities toward minimally invasive treatments and patient-centered outcomes, providing direction for future research and improvements in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

