Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CAM photosynthesis may have conferred an advantage during the Permian-Triassic mass extinction event.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

LiBRe: A Ligand-Aware Sequence-Based Binding Residue Prediction Model for Virtual Screening.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Special Issue: RECOMB Satellite Conference on Comparative Genomics (RECOMB-CG 2025).

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same author

Early evolutionary history of the seed.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026
Same author

The IGVF catalog-from genetic variation to function.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Data navigation on the ENCODE portal.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KASSPer: Kinase Active Site Structure Prediction using Protein and Ligand Language Models and Its Application to Virtual Screening.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

IDR searcher: a search engine solution for public image resources.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KCFtools: Rapid alignment-free method for introgression screening and GWAS using k-mer profiles.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Meta2DB: Curated shotgun metagenomic feature sets and metadata for health state prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

conMItion: an R package adjusting confounding factors for associations in multi-omics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
09:19

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

4.9K

Gene spatial integration: enhancing spatial transcriptomics analysis via deep learning and batch effect mitigation.

Rian Pratama1, Jason Hilton2, J Michael Cherry2

  • 1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, South Korea.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|June 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gene Spatial Integration (GSI) uses deep learning to analyze spatial transcriptomics data, focusing on gene distribution. This method effectively integrates multiple samples and removes batch effects, significantly improving analysis tool performance.

More Related Videos

Application of Laser Microdissection to Uncover Regional Transcriptomics in Human Kidney Tissue
05:46

Application of Laser Microdissection to Uncover Regional Transcriptomics in Human Kidney Tissue

Published on: June 9, 2020

3.9K
Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens
09:14

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens

Published on: June 28, 2018

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
09:19

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

4.9K
Application of Laser Microdissection to Uncover Regional Transcriptomics in Human Kidney Tissue
05:46

Application of Laser Microdissection to Uncover Regional Transcriptomics in Human Kidney Tissue

Published on: June 9, 2020

3.9K
Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens
09:14

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens

Published on: June 28, 2018

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Spatial transcriptomics (ST) is crucial for linking tissue organization to cellular functions.
  • Current ST methods primarily focus on proximity, neglecting other spatial information like distribution.
  • Batch effects from diverse sample origins and technologies hinder ST data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a deep learning method for integrated analysis of multiple ST datasets.
  • To focus on the spatial distribution aspect of gene expression data.
  • To leverage single-cell analysis tools for enhanced ST data interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced Gene Spatial Integration (GSI), a data integration pipeline using representation learning.
  • Employed an Autoencoder network to extract spatial embeddings and integrate them into gene expression feature space.
  • Developed a method to handle multiple ST samples with minimal data loss and batch effect removal.

Main Results:

  • GSI successfully integrates multiple ST samples, enhancing analysis tool performance.
  • Significant improvements in clustering accuracy were observed when using GSI with Seurat and GraphST.
  • For instance, GSI almost doubled the ARI score for Seurat clustering in sample 151673 (0.225 to 0.405).
  • GSI improved GraphST clustering ARI score in sample 151672 from 0.614 to 0.795.

Conclusions:

  • Gene distribution is a vital spatial aspect for ST data analysis.
  • Integration and batch effect removal are critical for refined tissue characteristic analysis.
  • The GSI pipeline offers a powerful approach for advanced ST data interpretation.