Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

DinoFlow: Self-supervised pretraining in flow cytometry enables accurate detection of common hematopathological disorders.

Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry·2026

Same author

27-color flow cytometry for measurable residual disease detection in B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia.

Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry·2026

Same author

Embracing Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Support Tool for Clinical Decision-Making.

Clinical chemistry·2025

Same author

Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage With RUNX1 Mutations Show Similar Prognosis Compared to Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RUNX1 Mutations: A Study From the Bone Marrow Pathology Group.

American journal of hematology·2025

Same author

The Evolution and Recent Advances in Diagnostic Criteria for Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease.

American journal of hematology·2025

Same author

From Laptop to Laboratory: Development and Implementation of a Machine Learning Model for Detecting Iron-Deficiency Anemia.

Clinical chemistry·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

Performance metrics for machine learning solutions in laboratory medicine.

Nicholas C Spies¹, David P Ng²

¹Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Laboratory Medicine

|June 13, 2025

Summary

Implementing machine learning in laboratory medicine requires rigorous performance evaluation. This review details methods, best practices, and pitfalls for clinical application of these AI solutions.

Keywords:

artificial intelligence classification evaluation machine learning performance metrics regression

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

Laboratory medicine
Artificial intelligence
Clinical diagnostics

Background:

Machine learning (ML) solutions for laboratory medicine are prevalent in research but scarce in clinical practice.
Significant investment and integration challenges hinder the adoption of ML tools in routine healthcare.
Robust performance evaluation is critical for transitioning ML from concept to clinical utility.

Purpose of the Study:

To review common methodologies for evaluating ML-based solutions in clinical laboratory settings.
To outline best practices for the comprehensive assessment of ML tool performance.
To identify potential challenges and pitfalls in the evaluation process.

Main Methods:

Literature review of evaluation strategies for ML in laboratory medicine.
Analysis of common metrics and validation techniques.
Discussion of practical considerations for clinical implementation.

Main Results:

Evaluation frameworks for ML in laboratory medicine are diverse but often lack standardization.
Key performance indicators (KPIs) and validation methods are crucial for demonstrating clinical utility.
Pitfalls include data bias, generalizability issues, and inadequate real-world testing.

Conclusions:

Standardized, comprehensive evaluation is essential for the successful clinical integration of ML in laboratory medicine.
Addressing implementation challenges requires careful consideration of performance metrics and potential pitfalls.
Effective evaluation protocols will accelerate the adoption of reliable ML tools in diagnostics.