Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Screening for Proximal Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published on: February 10, 2023
Variability in Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients With Orthopedic Trauma at a Level 2 Trauma Center
Vidushi Tripathi1,2,3,4,5,6, Riley Sevensky1,2,3,4,5,6, Kevin Lu1,2,3,4,5,6
1Vidushi Tripathi, MD, is an Orthopedic Surgery resident physician at Hackensack University Medical Center. She graduated from Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, NY.
Patients with lower extremity orthopedic trauma often don't receive adequate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. This study found a New York trauma center frequently used unfractionated heparin (UFH) over preferred low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Trauma Care
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Patients with lower extremity orthopedic trauma face a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
- National guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) for VTE prophylaxis.
- A specific trauma center's VTE prophylaxis practices deviated significantly from national averages and guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively review VTE prophylaxis practices in adult patients with lower extremity orthopedic trauma.
- To identify trends and aberrant administration of VTE prophylaxis at a New York Level 2 Trauma Center.
- To assess adherence to institutional and national guidelines favoring LMWH over UFH.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of VTE prophylaxis in adult patients with lower extremity orthopedic trauma.
- Analysis of administration rates of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).
- Utilized Pearson chi-square tests of independence to determine statistical significance.
Main Results:
- Approximately 57.3% of patients received no preoperative VTE prophylaxis.
- Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was administered to 32.8%, while only 9.1% received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).
- UFH was used more frequently than LMWH across all demographic and diagnostic groups, and in general surgical units compared to orthopedics.
Conclusions:
- Significant deviations from recommended VTE prophylaxis practices were observed, with underutilization of LMWH and overuse of UFH.
- A substantial proportion of patients did not receive any preoperative VTE prophylaxis.
- A multimodal intervention is proposed to improve VTE prophylaxis practices and enhance patient care quality.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...

