Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

530
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
530
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

3.0K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
3.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

3.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
3.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

658
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
658

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modeling and analysis of influencing factors of primary accidents to secondary accidents based on structural equation model.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same author

Do motorists select safe routes over efficient routes? An empirical study using travel trajectory data.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025
Same author

A Short-Term Traffic Flow Prediction Method Based on Personalized Lightweight Federated Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Impact of speed on injury severity in single-vehicle run-off-road crashes: Insights from partially temporal constrained modeling approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2024
Same author

A negative binomial Lindley approach considering spatiotemporal effects for modeling traffic crash frequency with excess zeros.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2024
Same author

Perception Methods for Adverse Weather Based on Vehicle Infrastructure Cooperation System: A Review.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same journal

Assessing autonomous driving performance and environmental influencing factors using real-world operational trajectory data.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Multi-scale modeling of electric vehicle fatal crash risk: uncovering spatial heterogeneity and infrastructure-land use coupling mechanisms.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Differential sensitivity of self-reported driving and collision measures to aspects of shiftwork, sleep, and fatigue.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Delving into the visual attention of pedestrians during street crossing under time pressure: An eye-tracking approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Differentiating high-frequency and high-severity hotspots: A robust risk-evolution-volume (REV) framework.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Modeling takeover decisions in driving automation: a multilevel drift-diffusion model (MDDM) framework integrating human, system, and environmental factors.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.3K

Modeling decision-making during unprotected left turns using interpretable deep learning and uncertainty

Yubin Chen1, Yajie Zou1, Jun Liu2

  • 1Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|June 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Drivers face complex decisions during unprotected left turns. This study quantifies decision uncertainty, revealing that higher uncertainty correlates with increased risks and unsafe maneuvers, impacting autonomous vehicle safety.

Keywords:
Decision uncertaintyDriver decision-makingIntersection safetyTime pressureUnprotected left turn

More Related Videos

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.4K
Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.3K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.4K
Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Traffic Safety
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Autonomous Systems

Background:

  • Unprotected left turns are complex driving scenarios requiring unique decision-making.
  • Existing models often neglect information variability and intrinsic decision mechanisms.
  • Understanding driver decision-making under uncertainty is crucial for road safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze driver decision-making in unprotected left turns through the lens of decision uncertainty.
  • To explore the relationship between decision uncertainty and driving safety.
  • To identify key variables influencing left-turn decisions and quantify uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Conflict area calculation to identify interaction events.
  • Transformer model and Shapley Additive Explanations to determine key decision variables.
  • Jensen-Shannon divergence to quantify decision-making uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • Left-turning vehicles prioritize static variables (waiting time, vehicle type); oncoming vehicles focus on dynamic variables (time to stop line, speed difference).
  • Time pressure increases emphasis on lateral speed and yaw angles.
  • Higher uncertainty correlates with longer negotiation times, shorter post-encroachment times, and increased likelihood of emergency braking.

Conclusions:

  • Decision uncertainty is a critical factor in unprotected left-turn safety.
  • Insights inform autonomous vehicle decision-making frameworks for safer navigation.
  • Driver behavior in unprotected left turns is influenced by a complex interplay of static and dynamic variables.