Travel Distance Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Travel distance does not impact total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes. Patients traveling over 50 miles showed similar range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared to local patients, with no increase in complications.
Area Of Science
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Arthroplasty Research
- Patient Outcomes
Background
- Increasing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) volume at high-volume centers raises concerns about patient travel burden.
- Potential for fragmented postoperative care and adverse outcomes due to increased travel distance.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the impact of travel distance on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) after TKA.
- To compare outcomes between patients living >50 miles (travelers) and <50 miles (locals) from the surgical center.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of 430 primary TKA patients (2017-2022).
- Patients categorized as 'travelers' (>50 miles) or 'locals' (<50 miles).
- Primary outcomes: change in ROM, VR-12, KSS, KOOS JR. Secondary outcomes: 90-day complications, ED visits, readmissions, reoperations.
Main Results
- No significant difference in ROM change between travelers and locals.
- Similar rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in PROs for both groups.
- Comparable rates of ED visits, 90-day readmissions, and reoperations between travelers and locals.
Conclusions
- Travel distance did not adversely affect PROs or 90-day complication rates following TKA.
- Patients traveling over 50 miles achieved MCID at similar rates to local patients.
- High-volume centers can perform TKA without negatively impacting patient outcomes based on travel distance.

