Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

On-Site Molecular Detection of Soil-Borne Phytopathogens Using a Portable Real-Time PCR System
Published on: February 23, 2018
Optimising the detection of Trichophyton indotineae and its prevalence in a large Australian laboratory
Kyra Y L Chua1, Catriona L Halliday2, Amber Mason3
1Department of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of Trichophyton indotineae, an emerging drug-resistant fungus, in specimens submitted for dermatophyte examination at a large laboratory in Melbourne, Australia, from January to June 2024, and to examine approaches for best laboratory practice for detection of this species. T. indotineae has not been previously isolated at our laboratory. We examined all skin and hair specimens (nail specimens were excluded) for dermatophyte presence by microscopy and culture; species identification was performed by routine phenotypic methods. Trichophyton interdigitale, Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton isolates identified to genus level only, which were urease-negative or urease-indeterminate after 7 days, underwent internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequencing for definitive identification. A total of 202 Trichophyton isolates from 202 specimens (196 patients) were studied. The most common site of infection was the foot (tinea pedis, 39.3%) followed by, collectively, sites not specified (27.6%) and the groin (tinea cruris, 13.8%). Final identification revealed Trichophyton rubrum (n=128, 63.4%) as the most frequent species, followed by T. interdigitale (n=38, 18.8%) and T. indotineae (n=13, 6.4%). All T. indotineae isolates were initially phenotypically identified as T. interdigitale (n=7) or as Trichophyton species (n=6). T. indotineae caused tinea corporis (n=4, 30.8%), tinea cruris (n=3, 23.1%), tinea manuum (n=2, 15.4%), tinea pedis (n=1, 7.7%), tinea capitis (n=1, 7.7%) and tinea in an unspecified site (n=2, 15.4%). The estimated prevalence of T. indotineae was 0.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-1.0]. T. indotineae cannot be identified using phenotypic methods, and identification requires ITS sequencing. Whilst apparently uncommon herein, further studies are warranted to more accurately determine the likelihood of encountering this important species in different populations.
More Related Videos
09:42Isolation and Selection of Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples and Evaluation of Fungal Virulence against Insect Pests
Published on: September 28, 2021
06:53Isolation, Characterization, and Total DNA Extraction to Identify Endophytic Fungi in Mycoheterotrophic Plants
Published on: May 5, 2023