Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Home
Research Domains

Home
Research Domains

Related Concept Videos

Materials Engineering

Comparisons Of Glass And Plastic Waveguides For Augmented Reality Glasses.

Materials Engineering

Comparisons Of Glass And Plastic Waveguides For Augmented Reality Glasses.

Related Experiment Video

Terahertz Microfluidic Sensing Using a Parallel-plate Waveguide Sensor

Terahertz Microfluidic Sensing Using a Parallel-plate Waveguide Sensor

Published on: August 30, 2012

Comparisons of glass and plastic waveguides for augmented reality glasses.

Kevin Nilsen, Yuqiang Ding, Seok-Lyul Lee

|June 14, 2025

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Surface roughness in augmented reality (AR) waveguides blurs images. Smoother glass or coated plastic waveguides transmit higher resolutions, but wider fields of view increase sensitivity to surface imperfections.

More Related Videos

Soft Lithographic Procedure for Producing Plastic Microfluidic Devices with View-ports Transparent to Visible and Infrared Light

Soft Lithographic Procedure for Producing Plastic Microfluidic Devices with View-ports Transparent to Visible and Infrared Light

Published on: August 17, 2017

Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

Published on: March 19, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Terahertz Microfluidic Sensing Using a Parallel-plate Waveguide Sensor

Terahertz Microfluidic Sensing Using a Parallel-plate Waveguide Sensor

Published on: August 30, 2012

Soft Lithographic Procedure for Producing Plastic Microfluidic Devices with View-ports Transparent to Visible and Infrared Light

Soft Lithographic Procedure for Producing Plastic Microfluidic Devices with View-ports Transparent to Visible and Infrared Light

Published on: August 17, 2017

Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

Published on: March 19, 2016

Area of Science:

Optics
Materials Science
Optical Engineering

Background:

Augmented reality (AR) waveguides are critical for visual display.
Surface roughness in waveguides degrades image quality by blurring.
Understanding the impact of surface topography on optical performance is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the effect of surface roughness on the optical performance of AR waveguides.
To compare the resolution capabilities of different waveguide materials and surface treatments.
To analyze the influence of field-of-view parameters on system sensitivity to roughness.

Main Methods:

Utilized modulation transfer function (MTF) to quantify image quality.
Compared optical performance of untreated glass, untreated plastic, and coated plastic waveguides.
Investigated the impact of refractive index and incident angle on system sensitivity.

Main Results:

Glass waveguides exhibit superior resolution compared to untreated plastic waveguides due to smoother surfaces.
Spin-coating plastic waveguides with acrylic resin significantly reduces surface roughness, achieving glass-like quality.
Increased field of view, influenced by refractive index and incident angle, heightens sensitivity to surface roughness.

Conclusions:

Surface quality is a key determinant of resolution in AR waveguides.
Coated plastic waveguides offer a viable alternative to glass for high-resolution AR displays.
Design considerations for wider fields of view must account for increased susceptibility to surface imperfections.