Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: September 6, 2024
Standard continuous feeding versus intermittent feeding among mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care: A
Rakshit Panwar1, Nikhil Kumar2, Harshel Parikh3
1Intensive Care Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia.
Background:
Previous meta-analyses on the mode of enteral nutrition in intensive care unit (ICU) have not explored whether the standard practice of continuous enteral feeding is superior to intermittent or bolus feeding among mechanically ventilated patients. Large feed volumes maybe one of the barriers for the use of intermittent feeding. However, intermittent feeding when routinely paired with right lateral tilt positioning may be better tolerated. Aligning feeding-fasting periods with circadian patterns may also be beneficial during critical illness in relation to important patient-centered clinical outcomes.
Objectives:
This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the current state of evidence from all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing standard continuous gastric feeding and intermittent gastric feeding (with or without right lateral tilt positioning) among critically ill adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL for relevant RCTs published in the English language until September 2024. The primary outcome was all cause hospital mortality, expressed as pooled risk ratio (RR) for the standard continuous feeding relative to intermittent feeding. Key secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay, gut intolerance (vomiting and diarrhoea) and pneumonia.
Results:
Sixteen studies were identified for full text review out of a total of 678 records screened. Eight RCTs enrolling a total of 993 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was a substantial heterogeneity in outcomes selection, definitions, and reporting among these RCTs. Aggregate effect size for the primary outcome was RR 0.97 (95 % confidence interval 0.72-1.32, I2 = 9 %) for standard continuous feeding versus intermittent feeding. There were no between-group differences for any of the other secondary outcomes. Of all the included RCTs, the point estimate for all-cause mortality was least favourable (RR 1.55, 95 % CI 0.82 to 2.93) for the standard continuous feeding in the RCT that compared it against intermittent postural feeding.
Conclusions:
Overall, our meta-analysis did not detect any clinically relevant differences in important clinical outcomes between the two groups. Future RCTs should prioritise clinically meaningful, patient-centred outcomes such as mortality or ventilator-free days as primary endpoints.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42024591074.
More Related Videos
04:30Endotracheal Intubation Using a Flexible Intubation Endoscope as a Standardized Model for Safe Airway Management in Swine
Published on: August 25, 2022
06:57Use of an Integrated Low-Flow Anesthetic Vaporizer, Ventilator, and Physiological Monitoring System for Rodents
Published on: July 9, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...